PENTLAND@SRI-AI.ARPA (04/05/84)
[Forwarded from the CSLI bboard by Laws@SRI-AI.] Issues In Language, Perception and Cognition WHO: Len Talmy, Cognitive Science Program and German Dept., UC Berkeley WHEN: Monday April 9, 12:00 noon WHERE: Room 100, Psychology How Language Structures its Concepts Languages have two kinds of elements: open-class, comprising the roots of nouns, verbs, and adjectives, and closed-class, comprising all in- flections, particle words, grammatical categories, and the like. Exami- nation of a range of languages reveals that closed-class elements refer exclusively to certain concepts, and seemingly never to concepts outside those (e.g., inflection on nouns may indicate number, but never color). My idea is that all closed-class elements taken together consistute a very special group: they code for a fundamental set of notions that serve to structure the conceptual material expressed by language. More particularly, their references constitute a basic notional framework, or scaffolding, around which is organized the more contentful conceptual material represented by open-class (i.e., lexical) elements. The ques- tions to be addressed are: a) Which exactly are the notions specified by closed-class elements, and which notions are excluded? b) What proper- ties are shared by the included notions and absent from the excluded ones? c) What functions are served by this design feature of language, i.e., the existence in the first place of a division into open- and closed-class subsystems, and then the particular character that these have? d) How does this structuring system specific to language compare with those in other cognitive subsystems, e.g. in visual perception or memory? With question (d), this linguistic investigation opens out into the issue of structuring within cognitive contents in general, across cognitive domains.