[net.ai] Non-competition clauses and other employment agreements

ckaun%aids-unix@sri-unix.UUCP (04/13/84)

From:  Carl Kaun <ckaun@aids-unix>


I think that anyone concerned about employment agreements would do well
to contact a lawyer.  The different states consider various clauses in
employment agreements enforceable to differing degrees.  I seem to remember
reading an article about six months ago that said (broadly) that California,
for example, considered clauses restricting people from continuing their
professional careers to be not generally in the public interest, and such
clauses should be carefully considered as to enforceability for that reason.
This same article (which I am trying to dig up) said something about the state
of California holding that clauses assigning all rights to all ideas, patents,
etc. arising during employment, are enforceable only to the extent that such
ideas, etc. resulted from the employment situation.  Again, one should
really contact a lawyer to get a clear opinion in any given situation.  There
is enough variability in this area to make any general comments suspect.

My personal experience has been that employment agreements and the
employer's approach to them are remarkably uniform in industry.  When I
have questioned companies about these agreements, I am told that they
adopt this fairly standard agreement and hold to it firmly on the advice
of their corporate counsel.  The general idea (from the company point of
view) seems to be to claim all you can now, and work out what you can really
enforce if the situation comes to that.  They take this approach
not because of some malignant motive, but because it has proved the most
prudent course for them to take.