fritz@hpfclk.UUCP (fritz) (09/09/84)
/***** hpfclk:net.ai / sri-arpa!Laws@SRI-AI.ARPA / 10:14 am Sep 13, 1984*/ From: Ken Laws <Laws@SRI-AI.ARPA> As an example of improper induction, consider the heap problem. A "heap" of one speck (e.g., of flour) is definitely a small heap. If you add one speck to a small heap, you still have a small heap. Therefore all heaps are small heaps. -- Ken Laws /* ---------- */ That's a little like saying, "The girl next to me is blonde. The girl next to her is blonde. Therefore all girls are blonde." (Or, "3 is a prime, 5 is a prime; therefore all odd numbers are prime.") An observation of 2 (or 3, or 20, or N) samples does *not* an inductive proof make. In order to have an inductive proof, you must show that the observation can be extended to ALL cases. Mathematician's proof that all odd numbers are prime: "3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime; therefore, by INDUCTION, all odd numbers are prime." Physicist's proof: "3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime,... uhh, experimental error ... 11 is a prime, 13 is a prime, ...." Electrical Engineer's proof: "3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 9 is a prime, 11 is a prime..." Computer Scientist's proof: "3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 7 is a prime, ..." Gary Fritz Hewlett Packard Co {ihnp4,hplabs}!hpfcla!hpfclk!fritz