POSER@SU-CSLI.ARPA (09/29/84)
From: Bill Poser <POSER@SU-CSLI.ARPA> I would like to hear more about the language mentioned by briggs@riacs as a natural language suitable for use as an MT interlanguage. Specifically, what is it called and where is it documented? Where did he publish his demonstration that it is equivalent to certain kinds of semantic nets? I would also be interested to hear in what sense he means that it is a natural language. Virtually all known natural languages are ambiguous, in the sense that they contain sentences that are ambiguous, but that does not mean that they cannot be used unambiguously. An example is the use of English in mathematical writing-it is possible to avoid ambiguity entirely by careful choice of syntax and avoidance of anaphora. I wonder whether briggs' language is not of the same sort-a natural language used in a specialized and restricted way. Bill Poser (poser@su-csli,poser@su-russell)