LAWS@SRI-AI.ARPA (05/05/85)
From: AIList Moderator Kenneth Laws <AIList-REQUEST@SRI-AI> AIList Digest Sunday, 5 May 1985 Volume 3 : Issue 56 Today's Topics: Emotions and Memory Emotional Attachment Emotional Attachment Cognitive dissonance ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2-May-85 From: l12%dhdurz2.bitnet@WISCVM.ARPA Subject: Emotions and Memory Hello, My name is Wolf-Dieter Batz. I'm a Psychologist working at a software advisory board at the University of Heidelberg. This is my request to be put on the AIList. My special interest, which is also the basis for this request, lies in the metatheoretical aspects of memory research. In my thesis "About Model Construction in Memory Research", I investigated several theories about memory for their essential characteristics; theories were selected from Cognitive Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Neuroscience. Results indicated a number of questionable fundamentals in memory research. If anybody is interested in them I would like to get feedback. A very newborn idea in this context is to establish a new theory of emotions that is structurally related to a still-to-formulate theory of memory. I would be very glad for responses to this idea. - Everybody's invited! Kind regards - mit freundlichen Gruessen *** Wolf-Dieter Batz ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 25 Apr 85 09:28:33 pst From: ed298-aa%ucbjade.CC@Berkeley Subject: Emotional Attachment [I'll permit this message, not as another "rape" piece, but as it relates to the Minsky/Batali/Carter discussion of human emotional mechanisms. -- KIL] Having finally become quite weary reading abstract theorizing about rape (b (brought on by the posting of a dumb story I remember first hearing in high school), I'll add some down-to-earth comments. I won't try to link this to AI issues; I don't think it works that way, and I feel somewhat strange addressing this on this bb, but it seems appropriate to offer some first-hand information and "introspection.' I've been raped, and I've worked on a rape crisis line, counseling rape survivors. I've never run across anyone agonizing because of an instant "attachment" of some kind to the rapist. Many women are raped by men they know; in this situation indeed there can be very complicated feelings. But the strongest feeling I remember, and one which I've heard expressed by other women, is the world-altering loss of trust and security after any kind of rape. Rape is a act of violence and a robber of power; one who previously feels ok about something as mundane as walking down the street may no longer be able to leave the house, or only with the greatest fear and mistrust. The attitude, which is changing but still strong, that a woman who is raped has somehow brought it on herself is enough to add feelings of shame and self-hate to the complex of fear. I don't find anything funny about jokes on rape, or any other form of humiliation or violence. There is a great deal of work to be done to transform our communities, and society, into a place where rape is not tolerated, indeed, is viewed as something as incredible as cannibalism or any other barbarism of the past. Calling people on rape "jokes" is one thing which can be done, perhaps you all can think of other more stronger steps to take. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1985 16:22 EST From: MINSKY%MIT-OZ@MIT-MC.ARPA Subject: Emotional Attachment Bob Carter has answered Batali's objections to my "assault" theory better than I would have. Thanks. -- minsky ------------------------------ Date: Thu 2 May 85 17:58:22-PDT From: JMYERS@SRI-AI.ARPA Subject: Cognitive dissonance I am offended by Mr. Carter's views on the subject of rape, that the anxiety of the victim is caused by her "cognitive dissonance when the attachment machinery begins to operate...". Although this might in some sense be true, it is not the whole truth, and I cannot remain indifferent to what is to me such a dangerous statement. Anxiety is indeed caused by cognitive dissonance, but the conflict is between our opinion of the world, and our perception of reality. We must have a valid model of our world in order to survive--there is an incredibly basic drive in human nature to make sense of it all. And, given a conflict between our concepts and our perceptions, it is usually the concepts that win out. our perceptions, our evaluations of what is occurring, are twisted to align with our model of the world, so that we do not have to bear fully the psychic shock of having our basic assumptions undermined. This accounts for the human reactions of denial, repression, regression, rationalization, and other defense mechanisms, when confronted with the occurrence of a crisis. The most basic assumptions have to do with the meaning of life, the question of evil, the assumption of causality, and the myth of invulnerability. These are the foundations on which general behavior is based. After defining and discussing these concepts, I will come back to how they apply in the case of a rape. Each person has his own meaning of life. A great many people have not formulated it explicitly, but everyone has a vague sense of purpose, a reason for living; everyone has a sense that it means something to be alive, and that it does all make sense somehow, even if we don't understand it. (Note that knowledge of the existence of purpose does not require knowledge of the purpose.) This is one of the great things theology gives us, that we do have a reason for being here. If there were no reason, if there were no sense of, "I should stay alive because someday something might happen", then there would be no reason to get out of bed in the morning, to eat, to love. Starving to death takes too long; aspirin is relatively quick and soft, although some people prefer more violent ways of ending their existence. The fact that we are saddened and outraged when a person commits suicide indicates that we believe that he had a purpose. The reality of evil is a problem that most people cope with by ignoring it or denying that it exists. We like to think that the world is basically a nice place, that people are generally decent and reasonable, and that you can generally count on them not to do evil acts. Although this must be the basis for social interaction and trust, we get into the habit of believing, because we are fortunate enough no to encounter evil in the world, that there is no evil in the world(1). People in general, and especially computer scientists, like to believe in causality. Things happen for reasons. If you can know the reasons, then you can understand the event, and predict it or modify it. This implies that you have the power to determine your own life, and that you are therefore responsible for what happens, which is a pernicious lie(2). Remorseful people feel, "If only I'd have done things differently, this wouldn't have happened...". The fact is that they acted in the best way they knew how at the time, and they cannot be held responsible for something they didn't know how to do; furthermore, things may *not* have happened differently if their actions had changed. Finally, there might not BE a reason for an occurrence, in a fundamental sense it "just happened". The myth of invulnerability says that I have always been alive as long as I can remember, and therefore, at a very deep level, I always will be alive. Bruce Lee never dies in the movies. Sure, other people die of cancer, other people get divorced, other people go through the windshield when they drive after drinking or don't fasten their seatbelts, other people get raped, but it's not REALLY going to happen to ME. The myth of invulnerability allows us to continue to live and function in a modern world while threatened with everything from nuclear annihilation down to robberies next door, without becoming completely paranoid and dysfunctional. Given this framework of beliefs held by people in general, let us now examine the rape victim. She is directly and violently confronted with a reality that goes against her deepest assumptions; there is no place to hide (successfully) from her perceptions by repression or denial. A rape is a violent act of violation that has no inherent meaning; if such senseless things occur as *reality*, then maybe life has no meaning after all. Rape is one of the ultimate evils. The rape victim is directly confronted with an experience of undeniable evil; she must completely revise her opinions of the basic nature of mankind and men, what she now believes will happen in the future from a given situation, and how far she can trust people. The rape victim is confronted with a random act that does not make sense, that she realistically could not change or stop from happening. Yet, she still feels that maybe it happened because of something she did, maybe if she somehow had done something different that it wouldn't have happened. Not only must she deal with these feelings, but she must accept the horrifying concept that causality does not apply at some times. Finally, the rape victim has something terrible happen directly to her, something that she cannot ignore, that shatters her illusion of invulnerability. She must directly confront the fact of her own mortality at a gut level, something that most of us are unable to do completely. Again, it is not these emotions or concepts per se that are so difficult to deal with; it is the fact that they are completely opposed to the current belief structure of the victim, which is the basis for survivability. She is forced to somehow integrate these new values into her beliefs. She cannot survive with her old beliefs; she has no way of knowing whether she will survive with her new beliefs, and so her survivability is seriously within question. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created in the victim by attempting to integrate any one of these four areas into her belief structure is a stronger and more probable explanation for anxiety than a theoretical "attachment bond" to the attacker. I also feel that the "attachment bond" theory is open to distortion, and could promote significantly unhealthy attitudes in the population at large (e.g., "she really loves it", "it's not the rapist's fault", etc.) Finally, I would like to again call attention to the concept of homosexual rape. This is a reality that people do not like to think or talk about. Male computer scientists are not immune to being raped, and I strongly believe that considering the concept of it happening to YOU puts things in a much different perspective than the abstract idea of it happening to some woman. In such a situation, you would be given the same choice: submit or die. I hope you find such an idea extremely offensive and revolting. RAPE, IN GENERAL, IS. Notes: (1) Proving the existence of evil raises disturbing fundamental questions about the existence or direction of purpose in life. (2) Paradoxically, the concept that you do not have the power to determine your own life, and that you are not responsible for what happens to you, is also a pernicious lie. The Theater of the Absurd is based on this concept. ------------------------------ End of AIList Digest ********************