[net.med] chlamydia: bacteria or virus?

werner@aecom.UUCP (Craig Werner) (03/12/85)

> I thought chlamydia was a bacteria.  Yet here we have Merck
> saying that Reiters is associated with 'nonbacterial
> urethritis'; and proposing that tetracycline may control it...
> Am I reading this wrong or what?  Is chlamydia a bacteria or a virus?
> Can tetracycline do anything against viruses?
		> E. Michael Smith  ...!{hplabs,ihnp4,amd,nsc}!amdahl!ems

The question is: Is chlamydia a bacteria or a virus?

The answer is Yes and/or No.

	Chlamydia is like a bacteria (only smaller) in that it does much
of its own synthesis, but like a virus in that it is an obligate
intracellular parasite.
	Normal	antibiotics act on the bacterial cell wall so will not
kill chlamydia, hence the reason it is classed with 'nonbacterial
urethritis.'  However, tetracycline interferes with bacterial protein
synthesis, so will affect chlamydia in some cases.

	Why all the fuss about it?
	One: it used to be there was a lot of gonorhea and syphilis and
that hid all the other venereal diseases. That's less so now.
	Two: it used to be impossible to detect. Now it's easy, so the
reason there is "an epidemic" is not because its more widespread, but
because most likely of better diagnosis.
	Three: some of things it causes are pretty nasty.

-- 
				Craig Werner
				!philabs!aecom!werner
		What do you expect?  Watermelons are out of season!