[net.med] Fake Arthritis Rx

wws@ukma.UUCP (Bill Stoll) (07/20/85)

In response to Craig Werner's notes about Placebos and how they mess
up "decent research".

I'm new to the net and so may have missed enough of the forgoing to
not really understand his position.  

I was taught in Medical School to distain the placebo effect.  It
turns out that the average new drug effectiveness is about 75%.  Since
the average negative side effects of new drugs is  >30%, and the
placebo effect accounts for about 40% in most studies, the total
positive effectiveness of new drugs is about 5% above placebo.

It seems to me the new field of "psychoneuroimmunology" is long over
due. This new field is tying immune changes to the effect on
endorphins of biofeedback, meditation, hypnosis, attitude, stress
(both physical and mental), etc.        

The placebo effect has always been the single most powerful part of
any therapy.  It has not been utilized partly because we had not
advanced enough scientifically to study it until recently but, mainly
because it does not require a prescription.  Research money is placed
where it is most likely to create a $ return.  The main beneficiary of
the placebo effect is the person with the problem. 

cbosgd!ukma!wws(walt Stoll)