wws@ukma.UUCP (Bill Stoll) (09/03/85)
The Newsweek article about SUGAR was sort of like the BIBLE: those reading it could get out of it about what they wished. Some of the letters I got agreed with me: they were gratified to see it given the prominence it was. Once the controversy is out on the top of the stack like this it won't be long before the facts will be apparent. I'LL TAKE MY LUMPS IF I'M WRONG---WILL YOU CONGRATULATE ME WHEN YOU LEARN I'M RIGHT? Some of the letters were down the middle. Which I think was the most realistic. At least the article mentioned that some respected researchers agreed with me (the first time I've seen that in a publication like this). Then there were the letters which insisted that the article specifically stated that sugar was safe and, as a matter of fact, a pretty good food. Time will tell and I'm willing to let my reputation rest on the things I've placed on the net so far. There are some things still not certain enough for me to bank on so I'll hold them will till enough information is in for me to take the plunge, I'll let you know. I've practiced, and lived, both ways. I've never seen anyone get healthier switching from a whole foods diet to a diet with sugar in it. I've seen lots of people get healthier going the other way. No one who has tried it would disagree so long as they follow the applied kinesiological protocol necessary to get results in a week or two. Full results can be expected in about 4 months but the most dramatic effect is seen in the first month. cbosgd!ukma!wws -- Walt Stoll, MD, ABFP Founder, & Medical Director Holistic Medical Centre 1412 N. Broadway Lexington, Kentucky 40505