[ont.micro] These newsgroups are proposed for deletion

msb@lsuc.UUCP (Mark Brader) (01/12/85)

These newsgroups are proposed for deletion.  Please see the referenced
article in ont.general.

MAIL responses to  {utzoo,utcs,utcsrgv,dciem,nrcaero}!lsuc!msb.

Mark Brader

isis@utzoo.UUCP (n) (01/13/85)

Mark, the proposed groups ont.micro, ont.micro.mac, and ont.singles are for
information specific to ONTARIO.  Why burden the net with text that is only
of interest to a local geographic area??  Only if people would use these groups
where it makes sense to.


References: <284@lsuc.UUCP>, <287@lsuc.UUCP>

-- 

---------
				Bill McLean @ Ont. Ministry of Health
				{allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!isis

laura@utzoo.UUCP (Laura Creighton) (01/13/85)

Nuke the groups. The idea is to post to net.micro or net.singles with
a DISTRIBUTION of ``ont''. The ont groups were a good idea when there
was no distribution feature, but those days are long past...

Laura Creighton
utzoo!laura

nishri@utcs.UUCP (Alex Nishri) (01/15/85)

I subscribe to ont.micro but not to net.micro.  I just don't have time to
read all the articles in net.micro, but I am interested in what people
locally have to say about micros.  The fact that articles are infrequent
in ont.micro means I stay subscribed to it.

As I understand "Distribution", it will require me to read net.micro in order
to get the same information I get in ont.micro.  (If I am wrong correct me.)

I vote for keeping ont.micro.