[net.lang.pasca] Rate different versions of CP/M Pasc

schultz (11/30/82)

#R:linus:-18600:uiucdcs:27900002:000:460
uiucdcs!schultz    Nov 30 10:05:00 1982








......and.. see the March 1982 issue of BYTE for a pretty good review of
4 Pascals: Pascal/M, Pascal/Z, Pascal MT+, and UCSD Pascal.  The reviewers
did not come to any conclusions about which implementation is "best", but
they discuss many of the differences and features of each product and they
provide the results of a series of benchmark tests that are of interest to
most users.  I'd recommend careful reading of the review before buying
anything.