[net.rec.bridge] Conventional interference over forcing 1C openings

ark (12/01/82)

I have occasionally played the following convention to help cope
with opponents who play forcing club systems.  It was devised by
Stu Blickman, as far as I know, though he may have gotten it from
somewhere else.  The theory is that when an opponent has opened a
forcing club and you make an overcall, LHO doesn't know where his
partner's strength is, so penalty doubles are hard.  They are even
harder if your overcall is conventional.  So:  your rho has opened
1C, strong and forcing.  Your responses are:

	double:	clubs and spades
	1D:	diamonds
	1H:	hearts
	1S:	spades
	1NT:	clubs and hearts
	2C:	clubs
	2D:	diamonds and hearts
	2H:	hearts and spades
	2S:	diamonds and spades
	2NT:	clubs and diamonds

With a balanced or three-suited hand, pass and await developments.
Ditto with a bunch of trash.

Believe it or not, these bids are designed to be easy to remember.
Here are the rules:  a non-jump suit bid is natural.   A jump in a
suit shows that suit plus the next higher-ranking suit, excluding clubs.
That leave two-suiters with clubs.  2NT is the good old-fashioned
unusual notrump.  That leaves clubs and either major for 1NT and double.
The reason you use 1NT for clubs and hearts is that that way, you shut
out the spade suit which you don't have, forcing them to bid at the
two level whichever major you've got.

I would tend to play the entire three level in this position as a
conventional pre-empt -- a long suit with a bunch of playing tricks.

halle1 (12/01/82)

This is a minor modification of Truscott (orinverted Truscott, i forget which).
AT invented it to counteract the Italian club systems when he was playing
for England.  I do find interesting the modification with clubs excluded from
the string.  It seems workable.