[net.rec.bridge] constructive raises

rainbow@ihuxe.UUCP (11/28/84)

  
I'd like to see some discussion on the merits or disadvantages of
constructive raises. Does anyone out there have any feelings on the 
subject? Also consider if being a passed hand makes a difference.
  
The definition of a constructive raise is generally a raise of opener's
major suit bid shows 8-9 points in support. Otherwise you must use a
forcing no trump call.

Obvious advantages include greater accuracy in game tries. 
But sacrifices include lack of preemptive value and partner is never aware of
a suit fit for sure(you could take a preference with a doubleton).
Please comment on the relative value of these various points and others you
may bring up.

wws@whuxlm.UUCP (Stoll W William) (11/29/84)

> 
>   
> I'd like to see some discussion on the merits or disadvantages of
> constructive raises. Does anyone out there have any feelings on the 
> subject? Also consider if being a passed hand makes a difference.
>   
> The definition of a constructive raise is generally a raise of opener's
> major suit bid shows 8-9 points in support. Otherwise you must use a
> forcing no trump call.
> 
>	...

I play that a single raise of partner's major shows 6-10 whether
you're a passed hand or not.  Seems to me that opener can easily
invite game (1S-2S-3S) with 15-17 points.  With constructive
raises, what use is there for the 3S bid in the above auction?

I guess the advantages are not clear to me -- what am I missing?

Bill Stoll
..!whuxlm!wws