nep.pgelhausen@AMES-VMSB.ARPA (01/04/86)
I have used C/65. My big problem w/ it is that it does not compile into binary, but it produces MAC/65 assembly code. It is nice to have this OPTION, but not to be forced into it. DISK SPACE GOES FAST!. Forget about the extra time to assemble it! Unless you have a hard disk it does not seem worth it. Deep Blue C (from APX) produces a small intermediate code file (similar to the p-code used by UCSD Pascal systems...but it is a c-code I guess) that needs to be run with an interpreter package. It is not as bad as it sounds, but Action! is definately faster. So long for now, -Richard Hartman max.hartman@ames-vmsb ------