[net.micro.atari] Splitting the group.

peter@baylor.UUCP (02/13/86)

I would have to vote yes, if I had a vote. I have no interest in the 520ST: my
personal opinion is that it's a pretty good IBM lookalike with a 68000 in it:
not a true next-micro-generation machine. On the other hand I do use an 800 and
find it quite usable for mucking around on.

Speaking of which...

Is ACTION! the only decent compiler available for the 800? I'd kind of like to
keep some sort of compatibility with my IBM and UNIX 'C' programs.
-- 
-- Peter da Silva
-- UUCP: ...!shell!{baylor,graffiti}!peter; MCI: PDASILVA; CIS: 70216,1076

franco@iuvax.UUCP (02/15/86)

Poor Peter has obviously not come within three miles of an ST.