hemanth@amdcad.UUCP (Hemanth Kanekal) (12/12/84)
<< not supposed to be here >>
It was the night of 7th December, on Tonight show,
and the host was Joan Rivers. The guests? --
Brook Sheilds, Dr. Ruth Westheimer, (I hope I spelled
the names correctly) and two others that I don't remember.
Well, a question was put to Dr. Ruth: What do you think
Ms. Sheilds do about her not having a crush on anybody
yet? -- a fact that Ms. Sheilds admitted during the show.
Dr. Ruth: She should'nt try to force herself into one.
Reasonable answer. I have a feeling that Ms. Sheilds will
have a tough time to get a crush on anybody at all! even
if she does not force herself... Why?
The reason is that the person who would
date her would not treat her as he (assuming Ms. Sheilds is
straight) would treat any other date of his. Why? Offcourse,
she is Ms. Sheilds!!. This is assuming that women prefer to
go after guys that treat women obnoxiously. The previous
statement is a kind of conclusion from the garbage on the net
about preferences of women. He would probably treat Ms. Sheilds
very nicely (assuming he is a decent guy , maybe wrong assumption)
so that she would never get to respect him since he cannot
put her down from the pedestal!!.
On the other hand ( again from the net.discussion.discussion.dis....)
if she did find a guy who would treat her in a derogatory manner
at least if not all the time , some time, then the relation
is liabel to go sour, since she would have the trauma of feeling
that she has lost "it" whatever "it" is in a woman's lingo.
It is possible that several theories may be tested out if one
merely watches and sees how she is going to turn out in her life,
Anybody interested?
{ On the other hand if this guy is really *MEAN* ...
OOOhhh! BOYY! What a feeling, for Ms. Sheilds!!! }
--
from a hackers dictionary ...
FOO from FUBAR (Fucked Up Beyond All Recognition),
The opinions expressed above are not in any way connected
to my employer ar to that matter myself only to this
absurdity called a VAX (pronounced as QUACKS) machine.chabot@amber.DEC (L 'S' Chabot) (12/13/84)
amdcad!hemanth = > > He would probably treat Ms. Sheilds very nicely ... so that she would never > get to respect him since he cannot put her down from the pedestal!!. > On the other hand if she did find a guy who would treat her in a derogatory > manner at least if not all the time , some time, then the relation is liabel > to go sour, since she would have the trauma of feeling that she has lost "it" > whatever "it" is in a woman's lingo. Uh, excuse me, but why are there only two possibilities here? 1) pedeastal 2) treated in a derogatory manner What about being treated as an equal, as a human being? Looks to me like you're discussing the angel/whore division of camps in the How to Handle Women debate. Surprise! Women are people! Treat people like people! > It is possible that several theories may be tested out if one merely watches > and sees how she is going to turn out in her life, Anybody interested? No. Generalizing about my life based on the follies of public figures has little appeal (no, no, really, I only buy the enquirer-type-rags when they have pictures of computers on the covers!). L S Chabot UUCP: ...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot ARPA: ...chabot%amber.DEC@decwrl.ARPA USFail: DEC, MR03-1/K20, 2 Iron Way, Marlborough, MA 01752 shadow: [ISSN 0018-9162 v17 #10 p7, bottom vt100, col3, next to next to last]