[net.sport.football] Another NFL Rating Method

kaufman@uiucdcs.UUCP (10/31/84)

A friend and I have come up with a simple but seemingly effective way for
rating the NFL teams.  Basically, it involves giving a team one point for
each win by a team it has beaten (double if they've beaten them twice) and
taking away one for each loss by a team it has lost to.  This is based on
the fact that a better team may lose to Miami, while a not-so-good one is more
likely to lose to, say, a Minnisota.

Through 9 weeks, there are some interesting results.  Despite their inferior
record, Washington is the highest rated team in the NFC East, due to the fact
that among their losses were Miami and San Francisco with their combined one
loss.  San Diego is ranked surprisingly low, until you look closely at what
they've done this season.  They're 0-5 in their division, and 4-0 out of it.
But those wins have come against three teams in the NFC Central (and not the
Bears, either!) and Houston.  They may have their hands full with the Colts
this weekend.  Buffalo, despite their being winless so far, is a point above
Cleveland in the rankings.  The two teams will be playing each other Sunday
on the Bills' home field.  Yet Cleveland is a 1 point favorite.  You may wish
to bet the house on the Bills. :-)

On an unrelated note, when is the NFL going to look at the new geographic
reality and move the Colts to the AFC Central?  They could be cleaning up
there!

Ken Kaufman (uiucdcs!kaufman)
"Lord knows, we need more statesmen."

kaufman@uiucdcs.UUCP (11/07/84)

[roughing the first line:  number 67 - defense]

     Here are the results of using the rating system described in the base
note, with my comments.  Note that after careful thought, I decided that the
only fair way to regard the Detroit-Philadelphia tie (with respect to this
system) was to count it as half a win and half a loss for each team.  By the
way, I hope none of you took my advice and bet the house on the Bills (that's
why I commented it with a ":-)" - Of course, if it weren't for that freak
fumble ...)

RANK    TEAM            RATING
  1     Miami            39           One thing that jumped out at me is how
  2     Denver           33 1/2       this system neatly bunches teams into
  3     San Francisco    31 1/2       groups, based on the distribution of
  4     LA Raiders       24           their ratings.  At the top, Miami stands
  5     Seattle          23           alone, thanks to their untarnished
  6     Chicago          22           record.  Denver and San Francisco have
  7     New England      20           also established themselves as power-
  8     Washington       19 1/2       houses who have all but guaranteed
  9     NY Giants        14           playoff spots.  The five teams from the
 10     Dallas           11 1/2       Raiders to the Redskins are legitimate
 11     St. Louis         9 1/2       contenders who are all worthy of playoff
 12     LA Rams           8           appearances.  The teams from  the Giants
 13     Pittsburgh        7           to the Chiefs all have solid teams, and
 14     NY Jets           6           some will see action beyond Christmas.
 15     Kansas City       5           San Diego, Philadelphia, and Green Bay
 16     San Diego       - 3 1/2       can be classified as anything from
 17     Philadelphia    - 6 1/2       mediocre to erratic.  From New Orleans
 18     Green Bay       -11 1/2       down to Cleveland, we find the teams
 19     New Orleans     -19           that have been having just plain bad
 20     Detroit         -19 1/2       years (Minnesota is ranked above Atlanta
 21     Indianapolis    -20 1/2       since they beat them in head-to-head
 22     Cincinnati      -21           play.  Speculation is welcome on whether
 23     Minnesota       -22 1/2       the two eternal losers should be ranked
 24     Atlanta         -22 1/2       together, or if Houston is in a class of
 25     Tampa Bay       -25           its own.
 26     Cleveland       -27
 27     Buffalo         -35 1/2
 28     Houston         -47

Of the 8 top teams, 5 are from either the AFC East or the AFC West.  It's a
shame that there are only four playoff spots available for them.  Miami and
Denver should be safe, but the race for the other two positions should be very
interesting.  The records of Seattle, the Raiders, and the Patriots are
roughly inversely proportional to the strength of their remaining schedules.
     The Pats are 6-4, but they have should-win games against Indianapolis
(twice), Buffalo, and Philadelphia, with fairly difficult challenges in St.
Louis and Dallas.  Should they sweep their should-wins and split the other two
games (reasonable enough projection?), they'll wind up 11-5.
     The 7-3 Raiders should be able to beat Detroit, Indianapolis, and Pitts-
burgh, but they also have games coming up with Seattle, Miami, and Kansas City,
who always play them tough.  They must win two of those three, since at 11-5
they'd lose to New England on the tiebreaker due to conference record.  They
are the kings of Monday Night Football, and Monday's game with Seattle may
be their season.
     The Seahawks are 8-2, but they have two upcoming games with Denver, as
well as Monday's showdown.  A game in Kansas City can't be taken too lightly
either; the Chiefs will be out for revenge.  Seattle must win at least one
of its three big games - a tie with New England gives the nod to the Pats
due to head-to-head results - but they are more than capable of it.
     I don't dare predict this one yet.

Ken Kaufman (uiucdcs!kaufman)