[net.sport.football] Seahawks and Monday's game

mas@drutx.UUCP (Mike Schwarz) (09/24/85)

After seeing the Seahawks/Rams game last night I came to the conclusion, if the
Seahawks win a game luck played a big part in the game.  I site the fumble of
a snap to Dave Kreig, ending up being a touchdown for the Seahawks.  I feel
that it is possible that the TD could have been ruled invalid and given the 
Seahawks the ball on the 30 yard line with a first down.  I don't remember the
rules on fumbles and a like but the defender(after watching the play 20 times
in disbelief) appeared to have controlled the ball long enough to rule another
fumble.  If this is true then the pass Kreig throw was invalid.  The ball 
would then go to the Seahawks on the fumble at the 20 yard line plus an 10 
yard penalty charge on #17 for an illegal pass.  The Seahawks ball on the Ram
30.  


I would like to hear any comments on the play.  And some people think my Broncs
are luck, hah.  The Seahawks' luck makes the Broncos' luck look like bad luck.

GO Broncos

Mike Schwarz


P. S. Bring on the Dolphins.  By the way any body in New York can tell me if 
The Broncos/Dolphins game is being broadcasted in the area.  I definitely want
to view this game, and I will be in NYC area this weekend.  I will be back on
the net Oct 21, and will miss 2 Broncos games, (sigh)

mcal@ihuxb.UUCP (Mike Clifford) (09/25/85)

> After seeing the Seahawks/Rams game last night I came to the
> conclusion, if the
> Seahawks win a game luck played a big part in the game.  

You must not have watched the whole game, or you'd know that the Seahawks 
did not win.

> I site the fumble of
> a snap to Dave Kreig, ending up being a touchdown for the Seahawks.  I feel
> that it is possible that the TD could have been ruled invalid and given the 
> Seahawks the ball on the 30 yard line with a first down.  I don't remember the
> rules on fumbles and a like but the defender(after watching the play 20 times
> in disbelief) appeared to have controlled the ball long enough to rule another
> fumble.  If this is true then the pass Kreig throw was invalid.  The ball 
> would then go to the Seahawks on the fumble at the 20 yard line plus an 10 
> yard penalty charge on #17 for an illegal pass.  The Seahawks ball on the Ram
> 30.  
> I would like to hear any comments on the play.
> Mike Schwarz
I saw the play as it happened and all the replays.  It was amazing, but I don't
think the Ram defender controlled the ball at all, definitely not "long 
enough" for it to be considered "in his possession".  I think the outcome of
the play was legal.

Mike Clifford