[net.sport.football] New Net?

jimb@ISM780B.UUCP (11/27/85)

>Shall I have this poor fool arrested for practicising medicine without a
>license?  Nah, it's been a nice day here.  Why spoil it?

>Robert A. Ekblaw
 [admittedly, a response to my FLAME, titled as such]


>I don't know if ABC is the problem.  Heck, I see alot of wierd camera angles
>during the Sunday games on CBS and NBC, too.  Criticizing one network over
>the others seems to me to be a general dislike of the network, not their
>football coverage.

>Robert A. Ekblaw
>(maybe I should stop signing these things.  I am getting the wierdest
>responses in the e-mail anymore).
 [response to somebody elses posting]

Having stumbled over this guy when I first started reading this net (yes, I
know, it's unavoidable), I've seen him insult other posters, label people
asinine, and in general display an amazing combination of boorish,
childish, and arrogant behavior, and THEN complain about antagonistic
postings and weird E-mail.  This should be a fun net.  Is anybody else tired
of this?

Is there a sympathetic SA out there who would volunteer to set up net.ekblaw
as a way of solving several sets of problems?  (Reference net.news on excess
traffic and non-tech nets being cut back....)

My apologies to any who feel I've breached netiquette...I squirm at recalling
the quote of Flaubert, "By dint of railing at idiots, we run the risk of
becoming like idiots ourselves."  Therefore, I now fall silent on this
matter.  (Delphi is silent now?  No, wrong era.)

	      "Flame away, flame away, Big-Ten land ...."

      -- from the bewildered musings of Jim Brunet

		  decvax!cca!ima!jimb

		  ucbvax!ucla-cs!ism780!jimb

		  ihnp4!vortex!ism780!jimb