dtvh@drutx.UUCP (VanHandelDT) (09/14/85)
> > >I saw parts of Chiefs/Raiders game and loved the fact KC is finally going to >show the league it can make a run at the beginning of the season as a posed to >the end. I do feel it fair to caution the KC fans though you still have 14 >games to go and 2 of the games are against the (hold down the applause) great >Denver Broncos. > >Good Luck to KC, and may the best team win the division!!!!! > >Mike Schwarz The applause is deafening . . . especially after the Saints beat'em this week!!! (-: Dan Van Handel drutx!dtvh drusd!dtvh
dtvh@drutx.UUCP (VanHandelDT) (01/20/86)
> >> Does any New England Patriots fan out there seriously think there is a chance >> the Pats will win the Super Bowl? > > The Patriots' best chance to win will be if everyone assumes that they >have no chance. That will make the Bears overconfident, an often fatal >error in big games. Just look at what happened to the Broncos against >Pittsburgh in the playoffs last year. > >--Greg > > . . . Just look at what happened to the Broncos last year - they were beaten by a better team!!!
wed@drutx.UUCP (DeibertWE) (01/21/86)
> The Patriots' best chance to win will be if everyone assumes that they >have no chance. That will make the Bears overconfident, an often fatal >error in big games. Just look at what happened to the Broncos against >Pittsburgh in the playoffs last year. > >--Greg >>. . . Just look at what happened to the Broncos last year - they >>were beaten by a better team!!! {To which VanHandel responds, unsigned:} If anybody should know it would be a Packer fan. They've been doing just that on a regular basis for years and years. Oops! I almost forgot; you posted an article about giving up on the Packers. In that case, if anybody should know it would be an ex-Packer fan. William D.
woods@hao.UUCP (Greg Woods) (01/24/86)
> >Just look at what happened to the Broncos against > >Pittsburgh in the playoffs last year. > > > >--Greg > > > . . . Just look at what happened to the Broncos last year - they > were beaten by a better team!!! Just as with the current situation (which is why I brought up this example!), it depends on your definition of "better". Clearly, since they won the game, the Steelers were "better" than the Broncos ON THAT PARTICULAR DAY. What I meant was that the Broncos looked better ON PAPER based on their performance over the whole season (having won more games in a tougher division). This game, the Bears may look better "on paper", but my point was that it depends on who is better this Sunday who will win the Super Bowl. I should think this is obvious, regardless of where your heart lies in either of these situations. --Greg