rsk@pucc-j (Wombat) (02/03/86)
In article <107@ucdavis.UUCP> ccs020@ucdavis.UUCP (Kevin Chu) writes: >In Article <472@tekig4.UUCP> maxg@tekig4.UUCP (Max Guernsey) predicts >> Final score - Bears 47 () - Pats 0 >Date: 24 Jan 86 18:07:34 GMT > >I think we have the winning prediction here. It's not right, but it's the >closest. Nice job Max. Congrats Max; and Mike Royko (of the Chicago Tribune) should also be applauded for predicting a 41-0 score on the Friday before the game. Me? I got 4-1 odds for spotting the Patriots 4 TD's, and I'm very happy. Besides, my Bears sweatshirt (ordered 10/12) finally showed up... -- Rich Kulawiec pucc-j!rsk or rsk@asc.purdue.edu
bert@ucla-cs.UUCP (02/13/86)
> > Congrats Max; and Mike Royko (of the Chicago Tribune) should also be applauded > for predicting a 41-0 score on the Friday before the game. > > Me? I got 4-1 odds for spotting the Patriots 4 TD's, and I'm very happy. > Besides, my Bears sweatshirt (ordered 10/12) finally showed up... > -- > Rich Kulawiec pucc-j!rsk or rsk@asc.purdue.edu that's funny. everyone i knew was getting 4 to 1 for spotting only 2 TD's. For 4, you should have gotten at least 8 to 1. how does it feel to be robbed?