[net.politics] Libertarian Political Creed

sample (04/26/83)

As a libertarian, I take exception to the title of Arlan Andrews'
article "Libertarian Political Creed".  His position is so far from
mine and from other libertarians in this area, that I think he is
applying the wrong categorization to himself.  I would classify him
under "radical right-wing redneck".


						Rick Sample
						ubc-vision!sample

pollack (04/27/83)

#R:inuxd:-28600:uicsl:16300004:000:2634
uicsl!pollack    Apr 26 15:24:00 1983

Arlen,
  Your remarks  all over this notefile really need a response:

***** uicsl:net.politics / inuxd!arlan / 10:35 pm  Apr 25, 1983
If Reagan is allowed to use his powers, Central
american will not be another Indochina. 
...
Viva El Salvador!
Muerte a los rojos!  (i.e. Death to the reds)
****************

Unfortunately, Reagan is exercising his powers. Each time he certifies
that human rights have improved in El Salvador, and sends more bullets,
more reds (that is, illiterate, starving peasants who wonder why their
life is so rotten) die.

Reagan is exercising his powers, sending millions to train mercenaries
to overthrow the recognized government of Nicaragua, which, by the way,
is not a dictatorship, has not massacred its own people, nor
nationalized U.S. company assets.

Reagan is exercising his powers, refusing aid to Costa Rica unless they
build an army suitable for American purposes.

Reagan is exercising his powers, discreetly sending helicopter parts to
Guatemala, where hundreds of thousands of people died since the
democracy was terminated by our own CIA in 1954.

Reagan is exercising his powers, training mercenaries to overthrow
Grenada, because they will out-compete our tourist colonies with a
brand new international airport.

Reagan is exercising his powers, pouring it into the Honduran Army so
they will be as useful as Somoza's National Guard.

**********************
I consider that the Reds have fired the first shot many times.
**********************

Talk about Socialists firing the first shot, eh? Allende didn't. Arbenz
didn't.  Castro didn't. Peron didn't. (Do you even know who they are?)
Each time a popular movement rises to power (through elections or
revolution) in Latin America, it is first Snubbed, then Embargoed, then
Attacked, and usually falls to a punk who tries real hard to physically
erase the national memory with the help of U.S. aid.

**********************
I will drink a toast on the day that El Salvador
drives the rats into the sea, and when Nicaragua
and Cuban hoodlums try to swim the oceans to our shores, begging for
asylum.  I would like to be there to toss them lead lifejackets.
*********************

Arlen, you should learn the real definition of a communist. The domino
theory is correct, but it is not international communism which spreads,
but the end of colonialization.

You should learn the real reason why the U.S. is constantly
battling "international communism" throughout Central America, and feel
the struggle within yourself. You might then not issue such ridiculus
junk. Tom Craver, at least, has class!

Jordan Pollack, Illinois.

----------

myers (04/27/83)

Is Arlan Andrews a human, or an AI program written by LaRouche?

soreff (04/27/83)

In reply to Arlan Andrew's article:
You certainly expressed your hostility clearly.  Frankly, I don't think of
the USSR as an opponent, but rather as a back up system.  I'm quite happy
to see them in space, because if the US space effort should expire of
internal causes (as the planetary science program has been close to doing),
I'm glad to see the USSR still running its program.  Politics is a
transitory thing.  In 500 years, I expect that more people will remember
Yuri Gagarin and Neil Armstrong than will remember the ideologies of their
nations.				-Jeffrey Soreff (hplabs!soreff)