[net.politics] Israel/Palestine

tbray@mprvaxa (09/23/83)

I feel strongly that anyone about to pontificate about the Middle East should
reveal in advance their ethnic/cultural/historical biases. Accordingly, I am
a Canadian WASP who lived for 11 years in Beirut, Lebanon (up till the civil 
war got bad) and has travelled extensively in the Arab world.

I hold the following to be self-evident:

1. The state of Israel is a historical necessity - history has proved that
   no Jewish minority can trust a Christian majority for very long.  It is
   also a political fact - the Israelis have repeatedly demonstrated the
   political will and military ability to defend what they see as their
   vital national interests.

   Accordingly, those extremists who question Israel's 'right' to exist are
   are either dangerously misguided or playing for political points.

2. The Palestinian people are broadly united in a desire for some form
   of national self-determination, and specifically united behind the
   PLO, despite its current troubles.  They represent a genuine 
   national-consciousness and national-liberation movement and their
   hearts are set on a home of their own.  They are Palestinians 
   before Arabs and they are not Jordanians at all.

   Accordingly, those extremists who dismiss Palestinians as nonexistant,
   who dismiss the PLO as non-representative, or who charactarize the
   basic Palestinian idea as terrorist are either dangerously
   misguided or playing for political points.

3. Polemics about what happened to the Jews, the Palestinians, and the
   Arabs in the historical up to about 1967 are irrelevant to the current
   political reality in the Middle East.

   Accordingly, those who draw sweeping conclusions from historical
   arguments about events in 2000 BC, 0 AD, 400 AD, 1948 AD, or 1956 AD
   are to be mistrusted.

4. The present foreign policies of the Israeli government are extremely
   bad for the peoples of the region, including the Israelis.  They have
   taken on the role of an oppressive army of occupation in the West Bank.
   They have involved themselves in a politico-military disaster in 
   Lebanon which has benefited only the government of Syria.  They have
   publicly allied themselves with the Lebanese Phalangists, as bloody-
   minded a bunch of fascists as you'll find anywhere.  The basic problem
   is that they are attempting to impose a military solution on a
   problem with roots in politics and nationalism, the same course the
   French followed in Algeria and the Americans in Vietnam.

 The Middle East problem reduces, essentially, to the Palestinian problem.
If the Israelis can find the courage to talk and deal with the Palestinians
there is a very real hope for lasting peace.  The Israelis will have to make
some concessions that will hurt, and the Palestinians will have
to settle for the fulfillment of a rather small portion of their national
dream.

 The first steps down the road which would lead out of the tunnel might be: 
a moderation in the West Bank and Lebanese policies on the part of the
government of Israel, and immedate abandonment of their ill-conceived
alliance with the Phalangists; the end of internal dissension in the
PLO, and that organization's disavowal of the more unrealistic portions
of its program;  the election of a US administration which has the 
political will to twist the government if Israel's arm to push it 
into those last few crucial concessions.

 The real tragedy and irony lies in the deep cultural similarities between 
Jews (should I say Israelis?) and Palestinians, and the parallels between
the position of the Zionists in the first half of the century and
that of the Palestinians today.  Palestinians, in the Arab world, tend
to get ahead - they value higher education, do well in business, and
produce an unusually high proportion of poets, politicians, doctors, and
scientists.  Their political organization is a loose confederation beset
by internal squabbling, with leading roles played by moderate elder 
statesman and by ruthless fanatics, both of whom put the good of their
nation above all other human considerations.  Does any of this sound
familiar?
...where would we all be without nationalism...
								tbray
			 ...decvax!microsoft!ubc-vision!mprvaxa!tbray