berman@ihuxm.UUCP (berman) (02/02/84)
I hate to interrupt the comfortable moralizing by the well fed about the hungry, but it seems to me there is a important issue being ignored in this debate. Is there not something odious, insane, and otherwise dastardly about an economic system that requires government to supress the production of food (by cash payment or the current "payment in kind") as is done in the USA, while there are so many hungry in the world? Would it be possible to change such a system to one where the prime raison-d'etre for food production is to feed people? Is that a dangerous idea? A little less moralizing about the godliness of the various positions in this discussion and a little more hard analysis of the causes of hunger might advance this debate to a more fruitful plane. Semper Fi, Andy Berman