[net.politics] Honesty in politics

peterr@utcsrgv.UUCP (Peter Rowley) (02/20/84)

How exciting... an election year!  Possibly for both Canada and the US (the
current Cdn govt has to call an election before spring '85).  But, so far,
it all leaves me a bit cold.  It is unclear whether or not the candidates are
deliberately trying to be all things to all people, but it comes out that way.
Fortunately, it still seems possible to read between the lines and figure out
what they would really do.

Still, it would be nice if this were not necessary.  Hence, I propose that
Honesty be introduced as one of the rules of the political game.  In return
for getting straight and complete answers from public people, we should agree
not to damn people for admitting they've made a mistake; all we will look for
is an indication that they understood why the mistake happened and that they
are taking measures so that it won't happen again.

It always struck me as very odd, esp. in my younger days, that it isn't
a crime for an elected official to lie to the news media.  Surely, it is as
bad as perjury.  Democracy is greatly aided by accurate and plentiful
information from such officials; greatly hurt by misinformation.  Once we
get the facts, the real problems will be more apparent, and we can start
making the hard decisions (and possibly sacrifices) needed to solve them.
As it is, the virtual torrent of perverted, misleading language that rarely
addresses issues directly makes even identifying the problems tough.  And
surely contributing to this torrent is an anti-social act worthy of
punishment.

So, I suggest that we get a new law on the books: perjury to the media.
If it is shown that an elected official knowingly lied to the media, that
official is immediately removed from office and possibly fined and/or jailed.
Elected officials would be responsible for the statements of appointees that
speak in their name, and possibly for other appointees (e.g. US cabinet
members).

Enough of this messing around, with "inoperative" statements, "arbitrary
deprivation of life" (StateDeptspeak for "killing"), and "pacification";
let's make 'em tell us the truth.

A footnote to this:  John Crosbie, Canadian MP and Finance Critic for the
opposition federal Progressive Conservative party, recently said (and 
repeated) that if he told the public what the PC's would do to the economy
if they were elected, no one would vote for them.  That's a twist...

p. rowley, U. Toronto