[net.politics] Ad parody

ark@rabbit.UUCP (Andrew Koenig) (04/11/84)

CAN WE HAVE AN OPEN DEBATE ABOUT WHETHER SMOKING CAUSES FOREST FIRES?

The issues that surround smoking in the woods and forest fires
are so complex, and so emotional, it's hard to debate them objectively.
Over the years, you've heard so often that smoking in the woods causes
forest fires -- and so little challenging those reports -- that you may
assume that the case is closed.

Studies that conclude that smoking in the woods causes forest fires
have regularly ignored major arguments and findings to the contrary.
For example, many people who smoke in the woods never cause forest
fires, and some forest fires occur even if no one smokes.  So how can
smoking possibly be a cause of forest fires?

Besides, if no one was there to see the fire start, and the fire burned
the cigarette that supposedly started it, how can we be sure that a
cigarette was the cause?

The evidence about smoking being a cause of forest fires is merely
statistical.  Simply because a large number of forest fires start where
smokers throw their matches or cigarettes doesn't prove that the smoking
actually caused the fire.

Many of the independent scientists who work for us or hope to receive our
large grants believe that the issue is far from clear, and that more open
debate and research are needed.  That's why we spend millions of dollars
each year on research to see if smoking in the woods can possibly cause
forest fires.

During the coming months we will discuss a number of other key questions
related to smoking in the woods and fires.  Some of the things we say
may surprise you, just as some of the things we said in this ad probably
surprised you.  We're even surprised that we had the gall to say them.

But we won't shy away from saying them, no matter how illogical they are,
because, quite frankly, that's our whole point.  We believe that if we
say these things often enough, some people will believe them.  And that
we can make any issue into a controversy by spending enough money for large
ads like this.  That's why we maintain that there are lots of unanswered
questions and no simple answers about any issue that affects our profits.

In future ads we'll try to convince you that smoking in bed doesn't
cause fires, and that smokers are more likely to go to heaven.

Please keep an open mind about our ad campaign.  The best way to do that
is to be sure that your mind is empty.


			J. R. Renegade Tobacco Company

[This ad parody was prepared as a public service by Action on Smoking
and Health (ASH), 2013 H Street, Washington DC 20006.  Permission to
reprint is cheerfully granted.]

chip@t4test.UUCP (Chip Rosenthal) (04/14/84)

That parody of the Tobacco Institute's ad is quite good.  This ad
series is most abnoxious, and its intents are so thinly veiled.  They
remind me of the Mobil ads, but several steps lower class.  I am so 
offended by this ad series, that I almost want to give up smoking.  !(-:

(By the way, !(-: indicates a comment which might be taken to be
sarcastic or funny, but is not intended to be so.)


-- 
Chip Rosenthal, Intel/Santa Clara
{pur-ee|hplabs|ucbvax!amd70|ogcvax!omsvax}!intelca!t4test!{chip|news}