diy@sb6.UUCP (D. I. Young) (06/15/84)
Apologies for the confusion that may result from readingthe previous article of the same title. A paragraph was screwed up, and here's how it is supposed to be written: So it would not surprise me that a second Reagan term would produce a 1986 Supreme Court ruling in response to a discrmination suit that would say "That business/real estate group/club doesn't really HAVE to accept/serve people of a particular ethnic group, because while we recognize the rights of of these ethnic groups, we also recognize the rights of the people who owns these businesses. It is THEIR business/club, and they have a right to run it as they please. That right can not be denied of them." Once again, sorry if there was some confusion from reading the paragraph in the original article, I'm not really sure what happened to it.
consult@uwmacc.UUCP (06/27/84)
Dennis ---
A nice summing up, thanks. And, unfortunately, I think
you're right. As long as uncle Ron is where he is, Heaven
help you if you aren't a young, rich, protastant, white male.
Welcome back to the "Leave It to Beaver" days...
R. DeMillo MACC