[net.politics] Comments on a Carl Rowan column

simard@loral.UUCP (Ray Simard) (08/12/84)

	Today, our local paper printed an article by columnist
Carl Rowan, in which he blames recent occurrences of child
molestation in day-care centers on the reduction of federal involvement
by the Reagan administration.  I find that argument so insupportable
that I wrote the following letter to the paper.

============= letter begins here ==============

     Carl  Rowan ("Least isn't always best",  Sun 12 Aug),  cites 
recent  stories of day-care child abuse,  mentions  the  minimum-
government  attitudes of Thomas Jefferson,  Ralph Waldo  Emerson, 
and Ronald Reagan, then attempts to relate the two.

     He  states:  "...I  find myself  confronted  with...ideology 
about  what  the  role of government ought  to  be.  ...Who  will 
protect...children?   ...no  one  in private America will  do  it 
unless someone launches a crusade".

     He  then  goes on to deplore the shift of  day-care  funding 
support  from the Department of Human Resources to the states  in 
block grants by the "hard-hearted Republican administration".

     The  role of government in these tragic cases is clear,  but 
Mr. Rowan, in his eagerness to pillory the Reagan administration, 
fails  to  see the obvious.   The DHR is  not  the  problem,  and 
reinstituting  its  day-care division would do nothing  to  help.  
The  persons  who molested children are felons,  and the role  of 
government  is  that of the police,  the courts,  and  the  penal 
system.

     The  regulatory bodies do have an obligation to inspect day-
care  facilities.   I doubt,  however,  that inspections  of  any 
frequency  would accomplish much to reduce or eliminate the abuse 
of children.   Those involved in the crime are certainly aware of 
the  possibility of surprise inspection,  and can  easily  create 
means of hiding any evidence from inspectors.

     These  abuses  can  be curtailed only by  a  combination  of 
observant,  caring involvement by parents,  and swift,  effective 
prosecution  of  the guilty.   Parents must  accept  the  primary 
responsibility  for  their children's welfare,  watching for  the 
danger  signs  of  abuse.   If  a child  reports  an  unusual  or 
frightening occurrence,  he or she must be believed, furthermore, 
the child must be taught to feel free to discuss anything without 
fear  of  reprisal.    Unloading  the  responsibility  onto   the 
goverment,  at  any level,  will only leave open the door to more 
tragedy.

     Mr.  Rowan  is  rightfully indignant over these  stories  of 
abuse.   He  could  much more effectively use the medium  of  his 
column  to advocate measures that work,  instead of flogging  the 
dead horse of ever-increasing federal regulation.
-- 
[                                                               ]
[     I am not a stranger, but a friend you haven't met yet     ]
[                                                               ]

Ray Simard
Loral Instrumentation, San Diego
{ucbvax, ittvax!dcdwest}!sdcsvax!sdccsu3!loral!simard