alf@ttds.UUCP (Thomas Sj|land) (09/21/84)
From: alf (Thomas Sj|land) Message-Id: <8409141734.AA18202@ttds.UUCP> Date: 14 Sep 1984 1934-MET (Friday) To: enea!mcvax!vu44!jack Cc: alf Subject: Re: Soviet Fighter hunting Swedish civil aircraft full of tourists. In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 14 Sep 84 12:09:22 -0200. Apparently-To: net.politics <8409141009.AA00648@mcvax.UUCP> > Although I don't know much about the Swedish/russian relations, I do know > that it is common practice among fighter pilots to "intercept" > civillian planes. Until about 4 years ago, it was even more > or less official policy in the Dutch airforce, until the union of > civil pilots started to complain. > I don't want to say anything about the intentions of the russian > pilot (or, more probably, his superiors), but I think that it > *could* be explained as mere "playing around". Jack Jansen, {philabs|decvax}!mcvax!vu44!jack What happened actually ? ======================== All our news media have been filled with various facts and speculations concerning what actually happened, what kind of evidence the military has, what the russian motives, if any, are etc. Evidently not much of that has leaked out into the international media. The Superior Command of the swedish defense published a commented map which shows the exact movement of the various aircrafts involved as this was recorded by the military radar. Some further technical evidence was announced but was never published for security reasons. (The military does not want to give the russians an exact picture of their technical capacity.) What is clear is that the soviet fighter was taking part in an exercise over the baltic sea where russian bombers were used as targets. These started from somewhere close to Poland and flew along the coast line towards Leningrad. The swedish Boeing 474 came 4000 meters higher and approximately 150 km to the west of this exercise in the ordinary flight route from Greece. At the time of the incident the Boeing had its land based control in Riga in Estonia, i.e. Soviet (civil) authorities had complete control over where this plane was and what it was doing there. Three possibilities seem to be the only logical explanations: 1) The fighter was ordered to follow the swedish plane in over swedish territory for some reason, either political (show the swedish government who rules the baltic) or military (test the swedish potential of detecting and interfering with foreign activity like this one). 2) The fighter was ordered to follow what was evidently a russian plane trying to escape to Sweden. This has happened before and as late as in 1982 there were reports that the Soviets shot down a fleeing aircraft from Estonia over international waters in the baltic. Some have actually succeeded especially Polish planes of which we have received at least 3 spectacular landings after general Jaruzelski closed the borders which were earlier open (polish citizens could visit Sweden without a visa and the opposite before the military take-over). 3) A mistake was made at the commanding military base in Estonia which was later corrected either by the pilot himself or by contacts between civil and military authorities, before any real damage was done. The third possibility is generally not beleived for a few different reasons: 1) The russians refused to accept the diplomatic protest claiming that the event never happened but is a 'fabrication by the right wing forces in the swedish military'. This is ridiculous since everyone who knows anything about how the media works in a democracy knows that they would not get away with this. The government is socialist and cannot be considered to be west-oriented. Check for instance what Pravda writes about the 'wise' Olof Palme in some very positive articles concerning his different 'peace'-activities in and out of the UN. Still it was Palme's government who, though reluctantly, issued the diplomatic protest. Evidently both Palme and his state secretary Pierre Schori, who is a warm friend of both Cuba and Nicaragua, beleive the swedish military in this matter. 2) If it was a mistake it would, as pointed out by swedish defense minister Anders Thunborg, not be particularly sensitive, though somewhat embarrasing, for the Soviets to apologize. This would immediately lead to better political relations between Sweden and Russia. Either the russian officials do not understand this, and that certainly makes them look alien to civilized people, or they have other priorities that make it impossible for them to apologize to a small country bordering to them. As long as the russians are refusing to accept the Swedish view of the matter, it is difficult to get more of a clear picture about what happened. Clearly the political effect in Sweden was devastating to what can be considered as Soviet interests, just like the submarine hunts that now are evidently starting up in Japan too. In the future the swedish Airforce will have fighter stationed on the island Gotland which was not the case now and led to that the russian fighter could follow the Boeing in attack position for as long as 8 minutes without being disturbed. The swedish organisation for civil pilots have protested to the foreign ministry about the fact that the pilot was not informed about the incident. Just in passing one can remind about the so called "catalina"-affair in the fifties where two swedish planes were shot down by the russians over the baltic sea, the first one disappeared completely (they found a lifeboat with bullet holes in it), and the crew of the second one (looking for the first one that was beleived to have had an accident) was saved by the Swedish navy and could tell the story about how they had been shot at without warning.