nxs@fluke.UUCP (Bruce Golub) (09/28/84)
Not only do you take a similar stand to Mister Reagan, you must also have the same teacher in Distortion-of-Truth 101. > = Milo (of course) >Violations of treaties will be made public 2 days after gromyko leaves NY. >There are some violations that proof will not be offered for, as giving the >proof would reveal the extent of US intelligence capabilities. Specifically: >There are some violations that proof will not be offered < As most intelligent and independant thinking persons know, the reason for not providing proofs is that they do not exist. (National security my ass. If He (Reagan) wanted to perpetuate security, he would provide these proofs of alleaged violations). >The Soviets already have an operational and well tested and deployed system >online TODAY. Can you support this alleagation also, or is it another matter of National Security. What I know of this situation is that BOTH the US and the USSR have been developing these types of weapons. Neither has tested their prototypes as yet. The Agreement does not specifially ban development, but prohibits the testing of anti-satilite weapons. >Its about time somebody in the White House realized that all arms control >agreements aren't good. Like the concrete proposals that Reagan has offered -: It is interesting to note that although Mondale held an officers postion in the Military, his stance with the Soviats is more moderate than Reagan who held a horses bridle in a lot of bad westerns. Every one says they can tell the differance between Hollywood and the real-world, but can they? Bruce Golub @John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc.
orb@whuxl.UUCP (SEVENER) (10/04/84)
> > = Milo (of course) > > >Violations of treaties will be made public 2 days after gromyko leaves NY. > >There are some violations that proof will not be offered for, as giving the > >proof would reveal the extent of US intelligence capabilities. > > Specifically: > > >There are some violations that proof will not be offered < > > >Its about time somebody in the White House realized that all arms control > >agreements aren't good. After harassing my local Congressman for the past two months he finally sent a copy of the Reagan administrations GAC report on Soviet treaty violations. Every single charge has been dealt with in various scientific journals or the 1981 joint report by the State Dept., Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Defense Dept. on issues brought before the Standing Consultative Committee - except the issue of a phased array radar site. I will deal with the specific charges in a later posting. The report has nothing new in it whatsoever. Tim Sevener whuxl!orb