[net.politics] Wealth Distribution

eder@ssc-vax.UUCP (Dani Eder) (12/06/84)

> >When is the last time you saw ANY newspaper present information about the
> >distribution of wealth in this country?  Occasionally they present information
> >about the distribution of income, never about the distribution of wealth.

     Always willing to throw some facts at a discussion, here is some
data on 'wealth' in the US.  The source data is the Statistical Abstract
of the US, 1978 edition, with adjustment to the present for inflation and
an assumed 2.7% per year increase in real wealth (this is the average 
historical rate).

NATIONAL WEALTH -- The value of the United States and everything in it
 except the people is 13.75 Trillion dollars, of which 10.5 Trillion
is privately owned.  The major components are: Land, 3.1 Trillion; 
Residences, 3.2 Trillion; Other Structures, 4 Trillion; Equipment, 2
Trillion; and Households, 1.45 Trillion.

PERSONAL  WEALTH -- The components of personal wealth are (in Trillions)
Real estate - 4.5, Stock - 2.6, Bonds - 0.5, Cash & Savings - 2.2, 
Debt Instruments - 0.2, Life Insurance - 0.4, Misc. - 2.5, less Debts
- (-2.4).

WEALTH DISTRIBUTION -- These figures are approximate and interpolated
values.  Real estate is assessed for tax collection, Stocks & Bonds are
traded on exchanges.  Hence, there is fairly accurate data on amounts.
Who owns what, on the other hand, is only investigated at death for
estate taxes, so the data is not as good.  With those caveats, the
table below gives the distribution of wealth in the US.  

Wealth Class	Net Worth	------------Percentages--------------
		(K$)		of population	Cum.     Cum. Wealth
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Superrich	>7500		.1		.1		22
Very rich	4000-7500	.3		.4		39
Rich		1500-4000	.6		1		52

Very wealthy	 750-1500	.8		1.8		61
Wealthy		 300-750	1.2		3		66
Moderately "	 175-300	2		5		71

Upper Upper	 100-175	5		10		77
Upper		  66-100	10		20		86
Lower Upper	  52-66		5		25		90

Upper Middle	  30-52		15		40		96
Middle		   8-30		25		65		99
Lower Middle	   0-8		20		85	       100
Poor		<0		15		100	       100
------------------------------------------------------------------

Dani Eder / Boeing Aerospace Company / ssc-vax!eder / (206)773-4545

mjk@tty3b.UUCP (Mike Kelly) (12/07/84)

Isn't interesting that, according to his figures, 1% of the U.S. population
controls more wealth than the remaining 99%?

Mike Kelly

krista@iham1.UUCP (krista anderson) (12/07/84)

<eat me>

>Isn't interesting that, according to his figures, 1% of the U.S. population
>controls more wealth than the remaining 99%?

>Mike Kelly

Yes, and 90% of the wealth is controlled by only 25% of the
population!  And 15% of the people are poverty stricken?

                 ihnp4!iham1!krista (k.j.anderson)

eder@ssc-vax.UUCP (Dani Eder) (12/09/84)

> 
> Yes, and 90% of the wealth is controlled by only 25% of the
> population!  And 15% of the people are poverty stricken?
> 
>                  ihnp4!iham1!krista (k.j.anderson)

Not necessarily the group you think of as poor.  For example, when I first
came to work at Boeing, I had about $10 000 in debts (mostly school loans)
and no assets to  speak of (clothes, books).  So I was in that negative
net worth group.  I could have spent every dollar I earned  and had a fairly
high standard of living, but not moved up in wealth.  I was poor in the
sense of not being able to stop working and continue to eat.  On the
other hand, a small farmer could have zero income and a large net worth
(40 acres at $3000 an acre, plus house and barn=$200 000).  He could sell
out and be comfortable on the interest.  
     What the government defines as 'poor' is low income, while the real
indicator is amount of capital.  Income is the first derivative of wealth
(in the mathematical sense of derivative), and is not the proper unit
to measure poverty.  I just wanted to clear up how to interpret the data
I presented.

Dani Eder / Boeing Aerospace Company / ssc-vax!eder / (206)773-4545

jim@haring.UUCP (12/17/84)

	>Isn't interesting that, according to his figures, 1% of the U.S.
	>population controls more wealth than the remaining 99%?

	>Mike Kelly

There is a theatre-group in Britain called '784'. The name comes from the
fact that in that country, 7% of the population own 84% of the wealth.

Jim McKie    Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, Amsterdam    mcvax!jim