[net.politics] Some non-partisan facts about the 2nd amendment

hollombe@ttidcc.UUCP (Jerry Hollombe) (01/22/85)

Before going on let's get one thing straight:

  I AM NOT TAKING A POSITION ON THE ISSUE OF GUN CONTROL IN THIS POSTING.
                     (So put away the flame throwers.)

I merely wish to present some FACTS that both sides may  find  interesting.
The  following  is  taken  (yes,  without permission) from the Uncommon Law
column titled "The Right  to  Arm  Bears"  written  by  Jim  Lange  in  the
January/February Mensa Bulletin (page 22).  Lange likewise took no position
on gun control in the article.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Text of the 2nd amendment:

"A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free  State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."

This is all the United States Constitution has to say on the subject.

The 2nd amendment is one of the few portions of the Bill  of  Rights  which
has  not  been binding on the states through the equal protection clause of
the 14th amendment.

In 200 years the Supreme Court has ruled only 4 times on the 2nd amendment.
Only  one  of  those  times  was  in  this  century.  In that case (U.S. v.
Miller) the SC upheld the banning of the possession of a sawed-off  shotgun
by the National Firearms Act on grounds that the sawed-off shotgun is not a
"militia weapon".

A militia is the state  equivalent  of  a  posse,  the  entire  able-bodied
citizenry.  No true militia exists, nor has, since the Civil War.

The 2nd amendment  has  been  more  honored  in  the  breach  than  in  the
observance.  The  right  to  keep and bear arms is, with the support of the
citizens, infringed in most urban states.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My sincere apologies to Jim Lange if  I  have  in  any  way  distorted  his
meaning  or  intent  in the process of extraction and paraphrasing.  I have
deliberately left out his speculations as to why the SC has ruled or failed
to  rule  as  it  has  and  his  remarks about possible interpretations and
extensions of their rulings.

It is my hope that these facts will give both sides of the debate something
to _think_ about (as opposed to shout about).

One more time:

		 NEITHER MYSELF NOR JIM LANGE HAS TAKEN A
                 POSITION ON GUN CONTROL IN THIS POSTING.

-- 
==============================================================================
The Polymath (Jerry Hollombe)
Citicorp TTI                               If thy CRT offend thee, pluck
3100 Ocean Park Blvd.                      it out and cast it from thee.
Santa Monica, California  90405
(213) 450-9111, ext. 2483
{vortex,philabs}!ttidca!ttidcc!hollombe