[net.politics] Licensing minorities into poverty

lvc@cbscc.UUCP (Larry Cipriani) (02/19/85)

I believe that 'white greed' has some basis in fact, but
probably not in the way most readers have in mind.

In our Facist economy, there are over 500 licensed (government
enforced) professions.  The *effect* of licensing (as it is usually
implemented) is to protect current workers from potential competitors.
How many minority plumbers, carpenters, electricians, hairdressers, barbers,
truckers, doctors, lawyers, etc. do you know of ? Not many I bet.  Every
one of those professions is licensed, (the situation as to truckers is
gradually improving largely because of trucking deregulation).

If you want to be a legal taxicab driver in New York, you have to
buy a 'medallian'.  The current market value of a medallian
is $60,000.  What poor person (read usually poor minority) can afford
this ? Why, why, why is this needed ?  To protect the public from
too many cabs ?  Bullshit.  Washington D.C. has nearly a perfectly
*free market* in taxicab service.  The service is inexpensive, the
drivers are courteous, and the number of cabs is very high.  But
in New York you have expensive service, obnoxious drivers, and
too few cabs.  The drivers in D.C. are mostly minorities, the drivers
in N.Y. are mostly whites.

Before the medallian system, *anyone* could put a 'taxi' sign on their
car and charge fares.  This proved to be a good way for many poor
people to inexpensively improve their lot.  Now the poor can't because
of the damn law.

There are many more examples of how licensing laws hurt the poor.
The book 'The State Against Blacks' by economist Walter Williams
discusses this subject very well.  Williams, by the way, is black.

Larry Cipriani cbscc!lvc