[net.politics] A Mathematical Model for Radical Cen

ashby@uiucdcsp.UUCP (02/17/85)

You make a false assumption: wealth is not bounded.  There is
NOT a finite amount of wealth that has to spread around subject
to some set of social/economic constraints.  Given the right
policies (FREE market), wealth is easily created, raising 
everyone's standard of living.  In doing so, our freedom and
security is enhanced.


                            Steven Ashby
                            Univ. of Illinois @ Urbana-Champaign

mmt@dciem.UUCP (Martin Taylor) (02/24/85)

>You make a false assumption: wealth is not bounded.  There is
>NOT a finite amount of wealth that has to spread around subject
>to some set of social/economic constraints.  Given the right
>policies (FREE market), wealth is easily created, raising
>everyone's standard of living.  In doing so, our freedom and
>security is enhanced.
> 
> 
>                            Steven Ashby

Except for the a priori assumption of what constitutes "the right
policies", this is dead on.  We get the driving power for generating
wealth mainly from the sun (and a little from nuclear fission), and
we generate it by organizing materials or people.  So long as the
resources are sufficient, we can be as wealthy as we want (as a society).
-- 

Martin Taylor
{allegra,linus,ihnp4,floyd,ubc-vision}!utzoo!dciem!mmt
{uw-beaver,qucis,watmath}!utcsri!dciem!mmt