[net.politics] The UN As a World Forum

mjk@tty3b.UUCP (Mike Kelly) (03/26/85)

I made what I thought was a fairly non-controversial statement:
The U.N. is the  world's political forum.

To which  mck@ratex.UUCP (Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan) replies:

NO!  NO!!  NO!!!  The U.N. is NOT the WORLD's political forum; it is a
forum for the OPPRESSORS of the world!

Now, there are somewhere around 145 member countries of the U.N.  Included
in these are certainly some pretty ugly characters.  But it seems pretty
silly to describe an organization which includes as members virtually every
nation in the world as a "forum for the OPPRESSORS of the world."  So they
get to spout rhetoric in New York; our ambassador does that every now and
then, too, you know.  

Ignored in this is the good work the UN does.  It attempts mediation of
world conflicts.  It does a lot of transnational research that only an
international organization could do.  It funds relief efforts all over
the world.

If we are to have a world forum, we must include at it all the nations of
the world, even those the rest of us don't like very much.  If you are
against having a world forum, then you should say so.  There are many in the
U.S. that like the approach of "Look, we're the United States and you will
listen to us, not the other way around.  If you don't like it, we'll just
blow you away."  Personally, I think the UN, although clearly very limited
in its abilities *because nations are unwilling to surrender any significant
sovreignity*, is a better approach to mediating world problems.

Mike Kelly