[net.politics] Point of Information

lkk@teddy.UUCP (07/09/85)

Point of Information:

1980 Defense Budget: $136 Billion

1985 Defense Budget: $260 BIllion


The Defense Department is the largest purchaser of goods and
services in the United States.


-- 

Sport Death,
Larry Kolodney
(USENET) ...decvax!genrad!teddy!lkk
(INTERNET) lkk@mit-mc

bakken@fluke.UUCP (Greg Bakken) (07/11/85)

In article <890@teddy.UUCP> lkk@teddy.UUCP writes:
>Point of Information:
>
>1980 Defense Budget: $136 Billion
>1985 Defense Budget: $260 BIllion
>
>The Defense Department is the largest purchaser of goods and
>services in the United States.
>
>Sport Death,
>Larry Kolodney
>(USENET) ...decvax!genrad!teddy!lkk
>(INTERNET) lkk@mit-mc

Much more relevant point of information:

In 1962, the entitlements, etc. budget was about half  that of the military.
In 1981, the entitlements, etc. budget was about twice that of the military.

It's very easy for the press and other people inclined to ignore these facts
to blame the budget deficits on Reagan, but he has been powerless to control
social spending.  Recall that the Constitution specifies that *all* spending
bills originate in the House, which has been controlled by the Dems almost
exclusively for the last 50 years.  Also consider that the house has not
passed a comprehensive budget for a number of years, instead relying on
individual appropriations bills.  This of course means that they have never
had the  the responsibility to add up all the suggested budget items at once
and do some compromising to get a balanced budget.  

The Dems fear a balanced budget amendment (while many, if not most
Republicans favor it) because it would force them to be responsible and would
not allow them to pass bills favoring their special interests without
considerable scrutiny.  Mondale had a reputation of being a captive of special
interests (most anyone with letterhead and a mailing list), but this is not
unique to him, as many of the leading Dems trade spending bills, tax breaks,
etc. for the support of individual constituencies, ignoring the good of the
country as a whole.

If you want to fairly blame Reagan for the deficit (I am assuming that you
would like to do so fairly), then give him a line item veto and let him put
the "fear of God" into anyone who tries to introduce excessive spending bills.
The governers of something like 42 states have line item vetos; its about time
that the President of the U.S. had it.

It is no coincidence that the Democratic party is in serious decline.  The
people of this country are finally realizing what BS the press and the
Democrats have been telling them and doing to them.


					Greg Bakken 

John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc.;PO Box C9090;MS 269D;Everett WA 98206;(206) 356-6298
{uw-beaver,decvax!microsof,ucbvax!lbl-csam,allegra,ssc-vax}!fluke!bakken
"Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of management... etc. ad naseum."

oliver@unc.UUCP (Bill Oliver) (07/12/85)

In article <teddy.890> lkk@teddy.UUCP writes:
>Point of Information:
>
>1980 Defense Budget: $136 Billion
>
>1985 Defense Budget: $260 BIllion
>
>
>The Defense Department is the largest purchaser of goods and
>services in the United States.
>
>
>-- 
>
>Sport Death,
>Larry Kolodney
>(USENET) ...decvax!genrad!teddy!lkk
>(INTERNET) lkk@mit-mc

Thank you for this interesting consult.  Unfortunately, such numbers are
useless without attribution.  It seems, for example, that various
mortality statistics derived from the American Tobacco Institute
occasionally disagree with those given by the American Cancer Society.
Raw statistics, while adding a certain flair to a conversation, 
are not preferred to those properly broiled.  At least to a 
connoissieur, the preparation is as much an art as the display.

Bill Oliver
Office of the Chief Medical Examiner
State of North Carolina


Usual disclaimer.