[net.politics] Israeli aggression

black@pundit.DEC (DON BLACK DTN 261-2739 MS: NIO/N13 LOC: POLE C6) (07/26/85)


Hey, Ken Perlow--

>> 	Yesterday israeli jets again carried out one of its most
>> 	cowardly and jewish acts by bombing the residential areas
>> 	of tripoli murdering over 40 civilians...
> 
>"Jewish" acts?  I'm certain there is no mention of jets in either
>Torah or Talmud.  Hey, this is a put on, no?

     Maybe not "Jewish" acts, but at least they might come under the
catagory of "typical Zionist aggression."  

     I'm surprised that the Israeli State hasn't used their nuclear weapons
on anybody yet.  I suppose they're keeping the nukes as an Ace-in-the-Hole.

     I see that several informed persons on the net realize that the Moslems
are not completely to blame for the turmoil in the Mideast.  Maybe someday
our elected officials will someday see the light.  After all, there are 
approximately 40 million Jews worldwide, and over a billion Moslems.  
Potentially, who has the bigger block of votes?

     One also has to realize that the Israeli State was formed by the edict 
of a One-World-Government organization, without the advice and/or consent
of the citizens of the area from which it was formed.  The United Nations 
itself had only been formed three years previously, by people who were 
dedicated to world domination.  The UN to this day has no legitimacy, and
neither does the Israeli State.

     The Palestinians inhabited the area for almost two millenia.  Who has
the better claim to the land?  The Israeli government never ever intended to
allow Christians and Moslems an equal say in its government.  How can the
Israeli government claim to be a democracy if all its people don't have 
equal rights?  How can the Israeli State expect to survive if it doesn't
respect the sovereignty of its neighbors?

     (The Talmud IS an interesting book, isn't it??  Maybe more Christians 
ought to read it.  They'd really get an education.  But that's a topic for
net.religion.)
 
>> 	if this is not terrorism..what is?.....maybe it was a good idea
>> 	Hitler was around...

     The murder of innocent civilians is never justified.  Terrorism is 
never justified.  Hitler was not justified.  

     But then again, if one considers the object of the bombings or terrorism
as mere cattle, instead of as human beings, what does it matter?
 
>Hey, Don Black, looks like your Identity Christian crowd has itself
>a live one here--sign him up.  Oh, no, I forgot--Hitler didn't really
>kill any Jews, did he, Don?  Well, you can reeducate this guy pretty
>quick, I reckon.

     Again, Identity Christianity is a subject for net.religion.  Besides,
the fellow might be a Moslem.  His covenant then would be through Ishmael,
rather than through Jacob.  So it wouldn't be proper to proselytize him.

     As for Hitler not killing any Jews, well, I guess there are pro's and
con's of the subject, aren't there?  I suppose the subject has been "proven" 
in a courtroom.  But that's relatively easy to do when the jury's been 
brainwashed, and the judge has been paid off.

     Freedom of speech, press, association, and association are the basic 
rights of any human being.  They cannot be revoked or repressed.  Every person
has the right to believe anything they want to, and to explain their beliefs
to any other person who will listen.  Certain groups in this country--and
I point my finger right at the Jewish Defense League--believe that they
have the right to terrorize the population into supporting their cause.
Aside from blowing up a few Murder Mills, the Christians in this country 
really aren't that militant----yet.


>> 	armand hammer...
>> 	Disclaimer:this is not my article...posting for a colleague.
> 
>Interesting pseudonym he picked, too.  (I know, I know, "how do you
>know it's a he?")

     I wonder how many of the net subscribers realize the connection between
Armand Hammer, his father Julius Hammer, and the Bolshevic Revolution and the 
subsequent threat of Communist world domination.  Armand Hammer to this day 
has in his office an autographed portrait of Lenin.  He considers it one of 
his most prized possessions.  And this snake has the chutzpah to call himself 
an American.
		     
		     *  *
		   ***  ***
In Hoc Signo     *****  *****

		******  ******
		 *****  *****
		  ****  ****
		   ***  ***
		    **  **
		     *  *




Don BLack
________________________________________________________________________________

     The opinions expressed in the above article are not necessarily those
of the management.