[net.politics] Is Sugar a Staple?

munson@squirt.DEC (08/16/85)

My dictionary, _The American Heritage Dictionary_, office version, says the
word staple means 1) a major product or commodity, 2) a major part, element,
or feature, 3) raw material.  As an adjective, it means 1) regularly grown or
produced in large quantities, 2) principle; leading.

In the items I mentioned in my previous posting, the first (noun) meaning 
certainly holds.  The second holds unless you consider the word 'major' in its
strictest sense, that is, as more than 50%.  The third meaning is debatable.
Sugar is certainly a refined substance, but it is used in many other end
products
.  The first adjectival meaning is indubitable, the second is arguable.

Anyone else want to argue that sugar is not a staple?

					As always,
					Joanne E. Munson

P.S.  For the grammarians in the crowd, yes, I know that the word I wanted
to describe the first type of entry in the dictionary was 'nominal'.  I only
hope my punctuation hasn't offended you in addition.

sdd@pyuxh.UUCP (S Daniels) (08/21/85)

>Anyone else want to argue that sugar is not a staple?

Sugar is sugar, and a staple is something you put in a stapler
to hold pieces of paper together.

Just kidding, folks, but the style is representative of the idiotic
drivel that's floating around this net.  I guess we can add "intelligent
discussion" to the list of net.politics oxymorons.

BTW, no offense to the original posters; the pun was too good an illustration
to pass up.
-- 
Steve Daniels (!pyuxh!sdd) "I'm counting the smiles on the road to Utopia."