[net.politics] US obligation to aid terrorists?

orb@whuxl.UUCP (SEVENER) (12/02/85)

> 
> Having sold the Nicaraguan people down the river with its aid to
> the Sandinistas, the US has an OBLIGATION to at least match that
> with aid to the resistance.
> 
> 		Jan Wasilewsky

I fail to see how the US has any obligation to give money to a group
which has killed over 10,000 Nicaraguans, bombed and burned 
cooperative farms, and is led by former members of Somoza's
National Guard.  If one is going to argue that we should be
sending guns and money to Nicaraguan terrorists then should we not
send guns and money to the African National Congress? Or those
opposing Pinochet in Chile? Or those opposing the Guatemalan
government which has massacred thousands of its own people?
 
Personally, I see no point in supporting such violence *anywhere*.
But I find it disgustingly hypocritical to impose an economic
embargo besides sending money to terrorists in Nicaragua because
it is "undemocratic" while refusing to impose an economic embargo
on South Africa which has killed hundreds of its own people in
the past year.
 
The right-wing's hypocrisy in claiming to be "pro-democracy" when it
supports violent terrorism around the world was nowhere more evident
than in Wm F Buckley's recent column in which he bragged about
the success of "stopping Salvador Allende's communism" by playing
a part in Allende's brutal assassination and the military coup
which slaughtered or imprisoned thousands of Chileans while
bringing an end to decades of democracy in Chile. This is
"support for democracy"?? This is blatant hypocrisy.
 
I am also quite tired of right-wingers claiming that no liberals or
progressives care about democracy in left-wing dictatorships.
That is pure bunk.  I oppose the recent suspension of civil liberties
in Nicaragua as do most leftists.  I do not know *anybody* who
supports Soviet repression of civil liberties, or the Polish repression
of Solidarity.  In fact, Joan Baez gave a concert in a church in
Gdansk for Solidarity last week attended by thousands of Solidarity
sympathizers.  In 1981 thousands of demonstrators gathered in
Washington, D.C. to rally for Peace and Jobs in our country and
in sympathy with the Solidarity movement in Poland.  The sponsors
were a coalition of progressive organizations.
 
On the other hand, I am not about to support the mining of any nation's
harbors, the slaughter of its citizens, or economic devastation as
the means of promoting "democracy". (a "democracy" which will only
wind up like the "democracy" of Pinochet in Chile: another brutal
military dictatorship run for the elite with property)
 
Much of the right-wing in fact doesn't give two cents for democracy as seen 
by their past actions in blacklisting innocent Americans, in arresting
dissidents trying to begin labor unions, in Edwin Meese's recent comments
that the protections of the Bill of Rights do not apply to the States.
While I think Libertarians are myopic and blind to reality at least
I give them credit for consistently supporting civil liberties.  Most
of the right wing such as Buckley, Falwell, Reagan, Kemp, et all don't
give a damn about liberty, democracy or anything but the rights of
the wealthy.
 Please excuse the tirade but the blatant hypocrisy of the right irks me.
              tim sevener   whuxn!orb