[net.politics] Divestment Issues at Reed College

ellen@reed.UUCP (Ellen Eades) (01/26/86)

It is now 11:00, Saturday evening.  As I'm writing this, a group
of 104 students have entered Eliot Hall, the main administration
building of Reed College, for a "friendly occupation."  I have
not been authorized to release any special information, but I'd
like to share my impressions with netters.

A large movement within the Reed community over the past year
has been concerned with divesting all Reed holdings in companies
which do business in South Africa.  Students have requested that
the Board of Trustees comply with a two-year deadline for
divestment.  Today, in response to that request, the Board
reiterated its support for the Sullivan Principles and for
companies which uphold them.  In response to this, the South
African Concerns Committee has led a move to occupy the main
floors of the administration building, though students are being
admitted to the computing facilities.

Part of the inspiration for this action appears to come from
similar events occuring at other campuses, primarily the recent
action at Dartmouth; Reed students are also drawing strength
from a tradition of student activism and particularly the
occupation of Eliot Hall by the Black students union in 1970
which brought about the establishment of a Black studies
department at Reed.  At present, there appear to be no Black
students in the occupying group; there are only 5 Black students
out of a campus of 1100.  Part of the students' concerns involve
an emphasis on increased minority enrollment at Reed.

A group of nine students who had been fasting since last monday,
Martin Luther King, Jr.'s birthday, broke their fast about 15
minutes after the building was secured.  There has been no
damage to college property and the group is using a consensual
discussion to achieve agreement on goals.

The mood is pretty good.  Students seem willing to stay
"indefinitely" to achieve goals.  However, classes begin this
coming Monday, and it is yet to be decided whether occupiers
will be able to freely come and go between classes .

I don't want to espouse any political stand at this time, I just
posted this "from the inside," so to speak, because I feel that
its a pertinent issue.  However, if there's interest I will try
to post some more updates on the situation as they occur.

Ellen Eades
(tektronix!reed!ellen)
-- 
-    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -
	"Who's been repeating all that hard stuff to you?"
	"I read it in a book," said Alice.
-    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -
	tektronix!reed!ellen 

thill@ssc-bee.UUCP (Tom Hill) (01/28/86)

> It is now 11:00, Saturday evening.  As I'm writing this, a group
> of 104 students have entered Eliot Hall, the main administration
> building of Reed College, for a "friendly occupation."  I have
> not been authorized to release any special information, but I'd
> like to share my impressions with netters.
> 
> A large movement within the Reed community over the past year
> has been concerned with divesting all Reed holdings in companies
> which do business in South Africa.  Students have requested that
> the Board of Trustees comply with a two-year deadline for
> divestment.  Today, in response to that request, the Board
> reiterated its support for the Sullivan Principles and for
> companies which uphold them.  In response to this, the South
> African Concerns Committee has led a move to occupy the main
> floors of the administration building, though students are being
> admitted to the computing facilities.
> 
> ect..

All those rich white kids protesting at an almost all white school...

Why that is mighty white of you.



				:-)