[net.politics] Corrupting Democracy

tedrick@ernie.berkeley.edu.BERKELEY.EDU (Tom Tedrick) (03/06/86)

OK, I am in a mood to argue about how Democracies 
can be corrupted. My particular interest is in
the role of information in this process.

Relatively free exchange of information is characteristic
of democracies, since in order to make intelligent political
decisions, the voters need information.

The first thing that comes to mind is how to manipulate the
information available to the voters, so as to influence their
political views.

Assuming intelligence is normally distributed (roughly),
the majority of the voting population in a democracy is likely
to be less than brilliant. So rather than appealing to reason
or the most intelligent voters, politicians have an incentive
to present information which will appeal to the masses. This
information is often simplistic or misleading.

I hope that is enough to start some kind of argument going. If
not I will provoke the democrats further :-)

I'd like to look at one recent example: I hear Kurt Waldheim
is running for office in Austria, and is in a close race
with elections coming up shortly (as an aside I was in Austria
last year, and even then it seemed like there were political
posters in lots of places, although I don't read German so
the meaning was unclear to me). So all of a sudden, right
before the election, information about alleged Nazi activities
is inserted into the media. This is a great trick for manipulating
an election. Even if the info is false it will be hard to
explain away before the election. If the info is misleading
it will also be difficult to come up with a good story. In
any case it looks like a nice tactic to throw the election to
the socialists.

Now who will benefit from tilting the election to the Socialists?
Probably not Israel, it doesn't seem likely they have anything
to gain by doing this. Well, who else then besides the Soviets?

Note: this information is 40 years old. Who had it all this time,
why wasn't it released earlier? It looks like a classic case
of destabilization by releasing information at a critical
moment. Since democracies are vulnerable to exploitation of
mass psychology in this way, they are inherently prone to
instability.