[net.politics] Is criticism Un-American?

ptodd@tekchips.UUCP (Philip Todd) (03/11/86)

It would seem, to judge by many of the articles posted on this newsgroup,
that criticism of the status quo in the United States is regarded by
many to be an activity which brands the perpetrator as un-American.

Tim Sevener, in particular, is continually plagued by responses which assume
that his (admittedly colorful) critiques of our society must be prompted
by the love of some other society (USSR) rather than a love of what our society could be.

Another response with all  the intellectual power of a knee-jerk is to 
condemn any article discussing the defects of a particular regime if equal 
weight is not given to the defects of regimes at the other end of the 
political spectrum. 

If we must, before writing, ensure that our negative comment about some
Marxist state is balanced by a negative comment of equivalent weight about
some military dictatorship, and this negative comment must be matched by
some slander about vote fraud in a token democracy, then we will never
write anything.

But perhaps here this newsgroup only echoes the nation as a whole. 
Congressmen are to be considered un-American if they disagree with any
aspect of RR's policies; any international dialogue between the US and
USSR on human rights elicits two disjoint lists of perpetrators.

With the spread of TV preachers in politics, however, we have not taken
this trend to the limit - will criticism of the current regime soon be
not only un-American, but also un-Godly?