[net.politics] Media bias in Paid ads

orb@whuxl.UUCP (SEVENER) (03/17/86)

Here is yet more evidence of the *right-wing* bias of the media.
This is a quote from an article in the New York Times by Aljean Harmetz
November 25,1986 p.C18 :
   "Although no one has made a reliable national survey on the matter
    a modest sampling suggests that groups producing programs supporting
    the policies of the Reagan Administration often have little
    difficulty in buying time.  John Fisher, chairman of the American
    Security Council, which makes the largest number of half-hour
    programs with a pro-defense viewpoint, said that the council placed
    "Peace through Strength" - a program aimed at alerting Americans
    about the dangers of "peace through appeasement" - on 174 stations
    in one week in September, 1984.

   "According to Mr. Fisher, "Peace through Strength" and "Crisis in the
    Americas", a pro-Administration program on Central America, have each 
    been shown more than 900 times on television.  In many cases the
    programs were broadcast free by stations as public-service programs
    for which the council did not have to buy time, he said.
   
    .....
   "Neighbor to Neighbor has filed a complaint with the FCC against KBHK-TV,
    San Francisco's Channel 44, charging a breach of the Fairness Doctrine
    (my note: Reagan's appointees to the FCC all support total elimination
     of the Fairness Doctrine)
    because of the station's refusal to sell time.  Mr Allen says that
    KBHK is usually willing to accept paid broadcasting and that the only
    prime-time coverage that Channel 44 has given to Central America
    in the last 12 months has been the pro-Administration opinions of
    the Rev. Jerry Falwell on his Moral Majority programs.  Mr Falwell
    buys $20 million worth of television time each year.
    
    .....
   "James Griffin, vice president of broadcast operations at WJLA, the
    ABC affiliate in Washington, said his station's policy was 
    "to provide a forum for enlightened debate on issues."  He said
    that WJLA did not run "Faces of War" because "we had just concluded
    a lot of discussion on the issue and we can't debate it forever."
    ....
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suppose once you've heard the Reagan Administration and right-wing
viewpoints, that is about all the discussion you need.
Anyhow, those peaceniks hardly contribute to "enlightened" debate.
 
         tim sevener  whuxn!orb