[net.politics] of lies and lunches

oaf@mit-vax.UUCP (Oded Feingold) (03/22/86)


>Your characterization that we are somehow responsible for poverty because
>we have created wealth ourselves is typical of the leftist/socialist
>tactics of mis-information and deliberate falsehood.  :-|  (Bob Bickford)

	1.  Where does Mr. Bickford or anyone else  get  off  accusing
	leftist/socialist  groups of being more misinformative and de-
	liberately false than their opponents?  I can understand some-
	one  who  lies to people in order to get money out of them, or
	cooperation in anything  from  building a weapon system to en-
	slaving the next country over for the good of the local deity:
	It  rests on the belief that humans are stupid and untrustwor-
	thy, deserving neither love nor respect.  More  pragmatically,
	social  inertia  is  so  great, and communication bandwidth so
	low, that even with the best of intentions  a  leader  has  no
	hope  of  achieving  consensus  on major actions in time to be
	meaningful.  Also, leaders are expected to be the  exceptional
	members of a community, whether they're selected for their in-
	telligence, energy, humanism, distinguished bloodline, parano-
	ia, ruthlessness or greed -- they're there because they desire
	to and do exceed the social norm.  Society  follows  at  least
	partly  blindly.   There is scope for undetected lies, whether
	with good or bad intentions.  Also for unintentional ones.

	2.  On net.politics, nothing ever gets accomplished.  This  is
	merely a discussion group, yet people constantly accuse others
	of lying.  Why bother?  If you lie, why?  If you merely accuse
	others,  but are as pure as snow (he said acidly,) what do you
	think those guys are trying to do?  Is it personal pride,  not
	to  lose an argument?  A higher "truth?"  Are you on retainer?
	What?
    	    In  a sense, we are each others' peers:  What  does it say
	about our relationship with  our colleagues, and ourselves, to
	engage in this class of bickering?

       	  Hey WIMP, what ya got in that lunchbox? (E. Meese)

Once  upon a time, we were poor enough that I sometimes went to school
without breakfast.  I would never, _ever_, cut out money  from  school
lunches.  The difference they make to a hungry child is sorta like not
having the flu.  In fact, I'll go further:  Reagan may oppose them be-
cause  he's  either  a heartless bastard or a demented old man without
any empathy - I don't know.  Reagan's advisors, without senility as an
excuse, rank right up there with people who like to drop little chicks
in milk bottles and squoosh 'em with sticks.  [An NFL football  player
of the 1970s used to do that, in order to get up for games.]
    To prove my seriousness, I'd support a higher tax rate if the mar-
gin were turned to purposes like that.  [Don't applaud - throw money.]

    	  We just bought a new disk.  Flames to me.
-- 
Oded Feingold     MIT AI Lab.   545 Tech Square    Cambridge, Mass. 02139
OAF%OZ@MIT-MC.ARPA   {harvard, ihnp4!mit-eddie}!mit-vax!oaf  617-253-8598