js2j@mhuxt.UUCP (sonntag) (03/24/86)
> >Even according to Start Wars advocates like Lt. Gen Abrahamson, > >stopping 95% of *current* Soviet warheads is the *best* Start Wars > >can be expected to achieve. What does this mean? > >It should be quite obvious than any dreams that Start Wars can > >somehow "defend our population" is simply that : a dream > >on the order of saying we could put a man in the Alpha Centauri > >system by the Year 2000! > > tim sevener whuxn!orb > > Also, you continually refer to it as "Start Wars". This seems to me like > name calling and nothing else. Even if you do believe that SDI will start > wars, calling it "Start Wars" is like calling a fetus "she" in net.abortion, > or referring to all liberals as pinkos. Not quite. A random fetus may not be a "she", and many liberals probably *aren't* pinko's, but if SDI works, it probably *will* 'start wars'. > Kenneth Arromdee -- Jeff Sonntag ihnp4!mhuxt!js2j