jackson@uiuccsb.UUCP (04/26/84)
#R:umcp-cs:-675300:uiuccsb:5600010:000:522 uiuccsb!jackson Apr 26 11:42:00 1984 The first Cray-1 was delivered to Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory in 1976. This machine did not have error correction circuitry in its memory -- only error detection. It had a MTBF of 4 hours -- this is the time that you were probably referring to. Cray's now have SECDED (single error-correcting double error-detecting) logic like any well designed machine should. I'm not sure what the MTBF of the Cray-1 is now, but it sure is a LOT more than 4 hours! Dan Jackson UUCP: {pur-ee!ihnp4}!uiucdcs!uiuccsb!jackson
jlg@lanl-a.UUCP (04/27/84)
We have five Crays here at Los Alamos and the MTBF is lots larger than 4 hours. I don't know what the official figures are, but we have had some machines run for several weeks without unscheduled down time. In fact one machine ran long enough without down time that a slight error in the clock rate had time to accumulate into a noticable error in the time of day.
davies@uiuccsb.UUCP (04/27/84)
#R:umcp-cs:-675300:uiuccsb:5600011:000:410 uiuccsb!davies Apr 27 09:16:00 1984 As a side note, I have heard that the first Cray-1 (the one without error correction) is still running somewhere (in England, I believe), and that its MTBF is now much more than 4 hours, as the memory chips most likely to cause errors have been found and replaced over the years. As a result, it is not only very reliable but also runs faster than other Cray-1 machines *because* it has no error correction!
ron@brl-vgr.ARPA (Ron Natalie <ron>) (05/01/84)
I think your rumor is placed on the wrong supercomputer. The Cyber Star originally had a MBTF of 5 hours. I don't know if it ever got better. (Still a lot better than our 780 used to be). -Ron
plb@omsvax.UUCP (Phil Barrett) (05/04/84)
An interesting side note about Crays and error correction. A while ago I was talking to some CDC engineers who said that Seymore Cray (when he worked at CDC) was absolutely dead set against ECC of any sort. The quote I heard (probably untrue, but it makes a good story) was "Over my dead body". Since ECC == good (:-)), the decision was made to use ECC. Seymore 'died' and went to heaven and the rest is history. Its ironic to now hear that crays are using ECC. Since this is second (probably N-th with N approaching aleph-null) hand, take it with a grain of salt.