johnson@uiucdcsp.CS.UIUC.EDU (05/13/86)
I consider designing assembler code using a high-level language to be "motherhood". I have always done it that way (since I wrote my first big assembly program in 1976), I thought most "modern" programmers did it that way, and I teach all my students to do it that way. Am I hopelessly naive?
ludemann@ubc-cs.UUCP (Peter Ludemann) (05/15/86)
In article <3700003@uiucdcsp> johnson@uiucdcsp.CS.UIUC.EDU writes: > >I consider designing assembler code using a high-level language to be >"motherhood". I have always done it that way (since I wrote my first >big assembly program in 1976), I thought most "modern" programmers did >it that way, and I teach all my students to do it that way. Am I >hopelessly naive? Not at all. I like to write my code first in Prolog, then translate it into something low level like C. The high level code makes good comments for the low level stuff.