RRACINE@ADA20.ISI.EDU (Roger Racine) (09/26/86)
Could someone please explain WHY one needs to use a derived type to overload the "=" operator? In particular, why does this not work? Instead of: function "="(left, right : my_type) return boolean; I tried : function "="(first, second : my_type) return boolean; I thought that when the access type was declared, an implicit declaration of the function "="(left, right : my_type) return boolean would occur. Then by using named notation inside the body of "=" I would be able to use the implicit "=". It does not work. Is this due to some rule about scope? Or are the two compilers I checked it on wrong? -------