plunkett@rlgvax.UUCP (Scott Plunkett) (03/08/84)
. I have read startling things re Turbo Pascal from Borland Int'l: o 4000 lines/minute compilation o Reasonably ISO conformant o Takes up 28K (compiler, editor, the lot) OK, now what's the trade-off here? 28K (bytes?) seems incredible. A good syntax-scanner for Pascal would take up more than that, never mind a Wordstar style editor, code-generator, and the rest lumped in as well. (It must be overlayed, but no one has mentioned this so far.) What is produced? A CMD file? A REL file? What of linking in separately developed routines? Relocatable libraries? Does the edit-buffer page to disk? What is the executable size of the following program? program tiny; begin end. I'm hunting for a good reason *not* to buy Turbo. Or has Compiler Utopia arrived? -- ..{allegra,seismo}!rlgvax!plunkett