[net.mail] A retraction!

jer@peora.UUCP (J. Eric Roskos) (08/18/85)

Awhile back, I mentioned (or alluded to) Seismo as an example of a site
that did strange things in terms of routing/header rewriting.  After talking
to their postmaster, I have retried the original message routings which
used to fail, and they all now work correctly... thus I wish to retract my
original example.  (Example still exist, since one of my test messages
failed because of yet another site that does it, but Seismo doesn't any
more.)

This does not constitute a retraction of the opinions expressed previously
about the nature of mail routing, etc., however; only of the above
specific example.  However, it does constitute an example that you can do
things right with Sendmail!  (And that is encouraging, too.)

Thank you to rick@seismo for pointing this out to me...
-- 
Shyy-Anzr:  J. Eric Roskos
UUCP:       ..!{decvax,ucbvax,ihnp4}!vax135!petsd!peora!jer
US Mail:    MS 795; Perkin-Elmer SDC;
	    2486 Sand Lake Road, Orlando, FL 32809-7642

	"Lbh xabj... jura lbh pybpx gur uhzna enpr jvgu gur fgbcjngpu bs
	 uvfgbel, vg'f n arj erpbeq, rirel gvzr."