[net.news.config] status of ucbvax

mark (09/14/82)

For those of you wondering what happened to ucbvax:

Recently, Berkeley decided that their 780 known externally
as ucbvax or csvax and internally as Ernie CoVax was burning
too many cycles on uucp.  They dedicated a 750 to processing
mail and named that 750 ucbvax.  The 780 is now known as ucbernie.
Berkeley put all their mail and news functions on this one 750,
both internally and externally.  ucbvax talks over berknet,
ethernet, and uucp links to other Berkeley machines and the
outside world.  (Their arpanet link is still a C/70, since
that machine speaks NCP.)

They rigged up a special shell on Ernie so that logging in as
uucp on Ernie would remotely run uucico on ucbvax.  Thus, uucp
was moved to ucbvax without anyone noticing.  (At least, that
was the idea.)  Eventually people would call ucbvax and the
load on ucbernie would go down.

As soon as the heavy load hit, so did problems.  The 750 was
running with rk07's as its only disks.  Microcode bugs that
only show up under heavy unibus load (from the ethernet) appeared.
The machine kept crashing.  Mail and news piled up on every other
machine trying to get through to ucbvax.  People at Berkeley
couldn't even send each other mail since it all went through ucbvax.
This period lasted about 2 weeks.

Eventually they got fixes for the microcode problems (I think)
and put a Winchester disk on in place of the rk07's.  Now the
machine stays up, but their /usr/spool/uucp is huge (50K bytes)
and we all know what happens when that directory gets huge.
Systems would call up and time out waiting for a response to
some intermediate request.  This left LCK files there, so the
next time the same system called, it got RLCK'ed out.  Still
no uucp mail got through.

Now they appear to be hand-feeding the system.  It's possible to
talk to it if your uucp is patient.  (We've increased our timeout
parameters to 3*45 seconds waiting for ROK and 20 alarms in a row,
and it appears to have helped.)  Some mail gets through and some
doesn't.  But the machine does stay up.

	Mark